Efficacy of the Orifice-Level Passive Ultrasonic Activation Technique in Removing Debris from Mandibular Molars: An Ex Vivo Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2024.54
Iman Bolourchi, Nazanin Zargar, Kamyar Khosravi, Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Leila Pourmousavi
{"title":"Efficacy of the Orifice-Level Passive Ultrasonic Activation Technique in Removing Debris from Mandibular Molars: An Ex Vivo Study.","authors":"Iman Bolourchi, Nazanin Zargar, Kamyar Khosravi, Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Leila Pourmousavi","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2024.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the orifice-level passive ultrasonic activation (OL-PUA) technique in removing debris from the mesial root canals of mandibular molars, besides comparing it with other approaches, including manual dynamic agitation (MDA), EndoActivator, and laser-activated irrigation (LAI). <b>Methods:</b> Ninety mesial roots of mandibular molars were prepared up to 25.06 using the Race rotary system, filled with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and then they were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15) based on the activation protocol: MDA, EndoActivator, OL-PUA, LAI (using a diode laser), and needle irrigation (no activation). Moreover, one group served as the negative control using normal saline as the final irrigant. The roots were decalcified and sectioned into coronal, middle, and apical cross-sections. After histological staining, the remaining debris was assessed with an optical microscope and measured in the canals and isthmuses using histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analyses were performed by using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (<i>P</i>=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Although less residual debris was observed after OL-PUA/LAI than using the EndoActivator/MDA methods, no significant difference was found between the four activation techniques at any root third (<i>P</i>>0.05). The OL-PUA/LAI group harbored significantly less remaining debris than the needle-irrigated samples at all root thirds (<i>P</i><0.05). Debris accumulation increased from the coronal to the apical root thirds. <b>Conclusion:</b> No statistical difference was detected between the four activation techniques in terms of debris-removal performance, and none of them resulted in completely debris-free canals. Orifice-level PUA proved to be a promising approach with significant efficacy in removing debris compared to control groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":"15 ","pages":"e54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the orifice-level passive ultrasonic activation (OL-PUA) technique in removing debris from the mesial root canals of mandibular molars, besides comparing it with other approaches, including manual dynamic agitation (MDA), EndoActivator, and laser-activated irrigation (LAI). Methods: Ninety mesial roots of mandibular molars were prepared up to 25.06 using the Race rotary system, filled with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and then they were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15) based on the activation protocol: MDA, EndoActivator, OL-PUA, LAI (using a diode laser), and needle irrigation (no activation). Moreover, one group served as the negative control using normal saline as the final irrigant. The roots were decalcified and sectioned into coronal, middle, and apical cross-sections. After histological staining, the remaining debris was assessed with an optical microscope and measured in the canals and isthmuses using histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analyses were performed by using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (P=0.05). Results: Although less residual debris was observed after OL-PUA/LAI than using the EndoActivator/MDA methods, no significant difference was found between the four activation techniques at any root third (P>0.05). The OL-PUA/LAI group harbored significantly less remaining debris than the needle-irrigated samples at all root thirds (P<0.05). Debris accumulation increased from the coronal to the apical root thirds. Conclusion: No statistical difference was detected between the four activation techniques in terms of debris-removal performance, and none of them resulted in completely debris-free canals. Orifice-level PUA proved to be a promising approach with significant efficacy in removing debris compared to control groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信