Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate for β-catenin (CTNNB1) mutations.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Ekkehard Hewer, Pascal David Fischer, Erik Vassella, Laura Knabben, Sara Imboden, Michael D Mueller, Tilman T Rau, Matthias S Dettmer
{"title":"Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate for β-catenin (<i>CTNNB1</i>) mutations.","authors":"Ekkehard Hewer, Pascal David Fischer, Erik Vassella, Laura Knabben, Sara Imboden, Michael D Mueller, Tilman T Rau, Matthias S Dettmer","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Mutations affecting exon 3 of the β-catenin (<i>CTNNB1</i>) gene result in constitutive activation of WNT signalling and are a diagnostic hallmark of several tumour entities including desmoid-type fibromatosis. They also define clinically relevant tumour subtypes within certain entities, such as endometrioid carcinoma. In diagnostics, β-catenin immunohistochemistry is widely used as a surrogate for <i>CTNNB1</i> mutations. Yet, it is often difficult to assess in practice, given that the characteristic nuclear translocation may be focal or hard to distinguish from the spillover of the normal membranous staining.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We therefore examined lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining, a nuclear marker of WNT activation that serves as a potential surrogate for <i>CTNNB1</i> mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of endometrial carcinomas with known mutation status (n=130) LEF1 was 85% accurate in predicting <i>CTNNB1</i> mutation status (64% sensitivity, 90% specificity) while β-catenin was 76% accurate (72% sensitivity; 77% specificity). Across a variety of entities characterised by <i>CTNNB1</i> mutations as putative drivers, we found diffuse and strong expression of LEF1 in 77% of cases. LEF1 immunostaining proved easier to interpret than β-catenin immunostaining in 54% of cases, more difficult in 1% of cases and comparable in the remaining cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that LEF1 immunostaining is a useful surrogate marker for <i>CTNNB1</i> mutations. It favourably complements β-catenin immunohistochemistry and outperforms the latter as a single marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Mutations affecting exon 3 of the β-catenin (CTNNB1) gene result in constitutive activation of WNT signalling and are a diagnostic hallmark of several tumour entities including desmoid-type fibromatosis. They also define clinically relevant tumour subtypes within certain entities, such as endometrioid carcinoma. In diagnostics, β-catenin immunohistochemistry is widely used as a surrogate for CTNNB1 mutations. Yet, it is often difficult to assess in practice, given that the characteristic nuclear translocation may be focal or hard to distinguish from the spillover of the normal membranous staining.

Methods: We therefore examined lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining, a nuclear marker of WNT activation that serves as a potential surrogate for CTNNB1 mutations.

Results: In a cohort of endometrial carcinomas with known mutation status (n=130) LEF1 was 85% accurate in predicting CTNNB1 mutation status (64% sensitivity, 90% specificity) while β-catenin was 76% accurate (72% sensitivity; 77% specificity). Across a variety of entities characterised by CTNNB1 mutations as putative drivers, we found diffuse and strong expression of LEF1 in 77% of cases. LEF1 immunostaining proved easier to interpret than β-catenin immunostaining in 54% of cases, more difficult in 1% of cases and comparable in the remaining cases.

Conclusion: We conclude that LEF1 immunostaining is a useful surrogate marker for CTNNB1 mutations. It favourably complements β-catenin immunohistochemistry and outperforms the latter as a single marker.

目的:影响β-catenin(CTNNB1)基因第3外显子的突变会导致WNT信号的构成性激活,是包括类苔藓样纤维瘤病在内的几种肿瘤实体的诊断标志。它们还在某些实体中定义了临床相关的肿瘤亚型,如子宫内膜样癌。在诊断中,β-catenin 免疫组化被广泛用作 CTNNB1 突变的替代物。然而,由于特征性核易位可能是局灶性的,或难以从正常膜染色的溢出中区分出来,因此在实践中往往难以评估:因此,我们研究了淋巴增强子结合因子 1(LEF1)免疫染色,这是一种 WNT 激活的核标记物,可作为 CTNNB1 突变的潜在替代物:在一组已知突变状态的子宫内膜癌(n=130)中,LEF1 预测 CTNNB1 突变状态的准确率为 85%(灵敏度为 64%,特异度为 90%),而 β-catenin 预测 CTNNB1 突变状态的准确率为 76%(灵敏度为 72%,特异度为 77%)。在以 CTNNB1 突变为推定驱动因素的各种实体中,我们发现 77% 的病例中 LEF1 存在弥漫性强表达。在54%的病例中,LEF1免疫染色比β-catenin免疫染色更容易解释,在1%的病例中更难解释,而在其余病例中则不相上下:我们的结论是,LEF1 免疫染色是 CTNNB1 突变的有效替代标记物。结论:我们得出结论,LEF1 免疫染色是 CTNNB1 突变的有用替代标记物,它与β-catenin 免疫组化互为补充,作为单一标记物优于后者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信