Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6
Pengan Chen, Gaoshen Mi, Jixiang Chen, Yu Liu, Zhongyu Jian, Xi Jin, Kunjie Wang
{"title":"Comparison of suction technique and non-suction technique in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Pengan Chen, Gaoshen Mi, Jixiang Chen, Yu Liu, Zhongyu Jian, Xi Jin, Kunjie Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P < 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P < 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P < 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1051-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04280-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) using the vacuum suction technique for the treatment of upper urinary calculi.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Sino Med, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane. We included studies comparing vacuum suction RIRS with non-vacuum RIRS. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these techniques. Key outcomes analyzed included operative time, hospitalization duration, stone-free rates, and complication rates. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 1 case-control study, and 9 retrospective studies) involving a total of 2029 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the vacuum suction technique significantly reduced operative time (MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P < 0.00001) and hospital stay (MD = - 0.54 days, 95% CI [- 0.80; - 0.28], P < 0.00001). In addition, patients in the vacuum suction group had a higher stone-free rate (OR = 3.57, 95% CI [2.57; 4.95], P < 0.00001) and lower complication rates, particularly in reducing postoperative fever.

Conclusion: The application of the vacuum suction technique in RIRS significantly improves clinical outcomes by reducing operative time and hospitalization duration, enhancing stone-free rates, and lowering postoperative complication rates. This technique demonstrates a clear clinical advantage over non-vacuum RIRS and should be considered a preferred option for the management of upper urinary tract stones.

逆行肾内结石手术中吸术与非吸术的比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:评价真空吸引逆行肾内结石手术治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Sino Med、CNKI、万方数据、Cochrane等数据库中进行综合文献检索。我们纳入了比较真空吸入RIRS和非真空RIRS的研究。按照PRISMA指南,我们对选定的研究进行了荟萃分析。纳入标准为随机对照试验(rct)、病例对照研究和评价这些技术疗效的回顾性研究。分析的主要结果包括手术时间、住院时间、结石清除率和并发症发生率。采用连续变量的平均差异(MD)和二分类结果的优势比(OR)进行统计分析,并采用相应的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共纳入16项研究(6项随机对照研究、1项病例对照研究和9项回顾性研究),共2029例患者。荟萃分析显示,真空吸痰技术可显著缩短手术时间(MD = - 14.45 min, 95% CI [- 18.45; - 10.44], P)。结论:真空吸痰技术在RIRS中的应用可减少手术时间和住院时间,提高结石清除率,降低术后并发症发生率,显著改善临床疗效。该技术与非真空RIRS相比具有明显的临床优势,应被视为治疗上尿路结石的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信