Performance Evaluation of Molecular Detection of Enteroviruses: Results of 18 Years of Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) External Quality Assessment Program, 2005−2022

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Kimberley S. M. Benschop, Harry Staines, Emily Mckloud, Elaine McCulloch, Dorothy Montgomery, Greg Sutton, Oliver Donoso Mantke, Anton van Loon
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Molecular Detection of Enteroviruses: Results of 18 Years of Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) External Quality Assessment Program, 2005−2022","authors":"Kimberley S. M. Benschop,&nbsp;Harry Staines,&nbsp;Emily Mckloud,&nbsp;Elaine McCulloch,&nbsp;Dorothy Montgomery,&nbsp;Greg Sutton,&nbsp;Oliver Donoso Mantke,&nbsp;Anton van Loon","doi":"10.1002/jmv.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The gold standard for enterovirus (EV) detection is the polymerase chain reaction based on the detection of the 5' untranslated region of the virus. Correct detection of EV is crucial for patient and public health purposes. The performance of diagnostic and public health laboratories on molecular EV-detection was analyzed using data from the external quality assessment program distributed by Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) between 2005 and 2022. Overall performance on core samples of both laboratory types has improved over the years for in-house or commercial assays (overall performance rate &gt; 94.8%) since 2013. A similar improvement was observed for negative/specificity samples. Performance on EV-positive samples varied, with the lowest performance observed on samples containing enterovirus D68 (B3 strain) and echovirus 11. Significant differences in performance were observed between laboratory and assay types. Performance of diagnostic laboratories (91.8) was significantly higher than of public health laboratories (89.9%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Additionally, a significant higher performance of diagnostic laboratories using commercial assays was observed (92.5% vs. 91.2% for in-house assays; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). In contrast, the performance of public health laboratories using in-house assays (90.1%) was higher than commercial assays (89.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.3608). The data document the improved performance of diagnostic and public health laboratories using either commercial or in-house assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":16354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Virology","volume":"96 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gold standard for enterovirus (EV) detection is the polymerase chain reaction based on the detection of the 5' untranslated region of the virus. Correct detection of EV is crucial for patient and public health purposes. The performance of diagnostic and public health laboratories on molecular EV-detection was analyzed using data from the external quality assessment program distributed by Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) between 2005 and 2022. Overall performance on core samples of both laboratory types has improved over the years for in-house or commercial assays (overall performance rate > 94.8%) since 2013. A similar improvement was observed for negative/specificity samples. Performance on EV-positive samples varied, with the lowest performance observed on samples containing enterovirus D68 (B3 strain) and echovirus 11. Significant differences in performance were observed between laboratory and assay types. Performance of diagnostic laboratories (91.8) was significantly higher than of public health laboratories (89.9%; p < 0.0001). Additionally, a significant higher performance of diagnostic laboratories using commercial assays was observed (92.5% vs. 91.2% for in-house assays; p < 0.0001). In contrast, the performance of public health laboratories using in-house assays (90.1%) was higher than commercial assays (89.2%; p = 0.3608). The data document the improved performance of diagnostic and public health laboratories using either commercial or in-house assays.

Abstract Image

肠道病毒分子检测的性能评估:分子诊断质量控制 (QCMD) 外部质量评估计划 18 年(2005-2022 年)的结果。
肠病毒(EV)检测的金标准是基于病毒5'非翻译区检测的聚合酶链反应。正确检测肠病毒对患者和公共卫生至关重要。利用2005 - 2022年分子诊断质量控制(QCMD)发布的外部质量评估程序数据,分析诊断实验室和公共卫生实验室在分子ev检测方面的表现。自2013年以来,两种实验室类型的岩心样品的总体性能在内部或商业分析中都有所提高(总体性能率为94.8%)。阴性/特异性样本也有类似的改善。对肠病毒阳性样本的处理效果各不相同,对含有肠病毒D68 (B3株)和埃可病毒11的样本的处理效果最低。在实验室型和化验型之间观察到显著的性能差异。诊断实验室的绩效(91.8%)显著高于公共卫生实验室(89.9%;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Virology
Journal of Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
777
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Virology focuses on publishing original scientific papers on both basic and applied research related to viruses that affect humans. The journal publishes reports covering a wide range of topics, including the characterization, diagnosis, epidemiology, immunology, and pathogenesis of human virus infections. It also includes studies on virus morphology, genetics, replication, and interactions with host cells. The intended readership of the journal includes virologists, microbiologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, diagnostic laboratory technologists, epidemiologists, hematologists, and cell biologists. The Journal of Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Abstracts in Anthropology (Sage), CABI, AgBiotech News & Information, National Agricultural Library, Biological Abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, Veterinary Bulletin, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信