A pain research strategy for Europe: A European survey and position paper of the European Pain Federation EFIC

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gisèle Pickering, Mary O'Keeffe, Kirsty Bannister, Susanne Becker, Sonia Cottom, Felicia J. Cox, Elon Eisenberg, David P. Finn, Patrice Forget, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Eija Kalso, Magdalena Kocot-Kepska, Hugo Leite-Almeida, Jose Antonio Lopez-Garcia, Mira Meeus, André Mouraux, Bruno Pereira, Livia Puljak, Michiel F. Reneman, Iben Rohde, Ioannis Sotiropoulos, Nathan Skidmore, Thomas R. Tölle, Snezana Tomasevic Todorovic, Andrea Truini, Kevin E. Vowles, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Luis Garcia-Larrea, Brona M. Fullen
{"title":"A pain research strategy for Europe: A European survey and position paper of the European Pain Federation EFIC","authors":"Gisèle Pickering,&nbsp;Mary O'Keeffe,&nbsp;Kirsty Bannister,&nbsp;Susanne Becker,&nbsp;Sonia Cottom,&nbsp;Felicia J. Cox,&nbsp;Elon Eisenberg,&nbsp;David P. Finn,&nbsp;Patrice Forget,&nbsp;Thomas Graven-Nielsen,&nbsp;Eija Kalso,&nbsp;Magdalena Kocot-Kepska,&nbsp;Hugo Leite-Almeida,&nbsp;Jose Antonio Lopez-Garcia,&nbsp;Mira Meeus,&nbsp;André Mouraux,&nbsp;Bruno Pereira,&nbsp;Livia Puljak,&nbsp;Michiel F. Reneman,&nbsp;Iben Rohde,&nbsp;Ioannis Sotiropoulos,&nbsp;Nathan Skidmore,&nbsp;Thomas R. Tölle,&nbsp;Snezana Tomasevic Todorovic,&nbsp;Andrea Truini,&nbsp;Kevin E. Vowles,&nbsp;Esther Pogatzki-Zahn,&nbsp;Luis Garcia-Larrea,&nbsp;Brona M. Fullen","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pain is the leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life worldwide. Despite the increasing burden for patients and healthcare systems, pain research remains underfunded and under focused. Having stakeholders identify and prioritize areas that need urgent attention in the field will help focus funding topics, reduce ‘research waste’, improve the effectiveness of pain research and therapy and promote the uptake of research evidence. In this study, the European Pain Federation (EFIC) developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study used multiple methods, including literature searches, multidisciplinary expert debate, a survey and a final consensus meeting. The cross-sectional survey was conducted among 628 European pain researchers, clinicians, educators and industry professionals to obtain the rating and hierarchy of pain research priorities.</p>\n \n <p>The final consensus meeting involved a multidisciplinary expert panel including people with lived experience from 23 countries. The survey results guided discussions where top priorities were agreed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Content analysis identified nine survey themes, of which five emerged as top priorities: (i) understand the pathophysiology of pain; (ii) understand and address comorbidities; (iii) critically assess current therapies; (iv) develop new treatments; and (v) explore the biopsychosocial impacts of pain. Physical, psychological and social approaches were prioritized at the same level as pharmacological treatments. The top priorities were endorsed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The panel emphasized the importance of also clearly communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention self-management and personalized pain management in the final strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The content of the final top research priorities' list reflects a holistic approach to pain management. The equal importance given to physical, psychological and social aspects alongside pharmacological treatments highlights the importance of a comprehensive biopsychosocial-orientated research strategy. The expert panel's endorsement of five top priorities, coupled with an emphasis on communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention, self-management and personalized pain management, provides a clear direction for future basic, translational and clinical research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>EFIC has developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe that identifies pain research areas deserving the most focus and financial support. Implementation and wide dissemination of this Strategy is vital to increase the conduct of urgent pain projects, pain research funding and the implementation of research findings into practice, to ultimately decrease the personal, societal and financial burden of pain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain is the leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life worldwide. Despite the increasing burden for patients and healthcare systems, pain research remains underfunded and under focused. Having stakeholders identify and prioritize areas that need urgent attention in the field will help focus funding topics, reduce ‘research waste’, improve the effectiveness of pain research and therapy and promote the uptake of research evidence. In this study, the European Pain Federation (EFIC) developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe.

Methods

The study used multiple methods, including literature searches, multidisciplinary expert debate, a survey and a final consensus meeting. The cross-sectional survey was conducted among 628 European pain researchers, clinicians, educators and industry professionals to obtain the rating and hierarchy of pain research priorities.

The final consensus meeting involved a multidisciplinary expert panel including people with lived experience from 23 countries. The survey results guided discussions where top priorities were agreed.

Results

Content analysis identified nine survey themes, of which five emerged as top priorities: (i) understand the pathophysiology of pain; (ii) understand and address comorbidities; (iii) critically assess current therapies; (iv) develop new treatments; and (v) explore the biopsychosocial impacts of pain. Physical, psychological and social approaches were prioritized at the same level as pharmacological treatments. The top priorities were endorsed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The panel emphasized the importance of also clearly communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention self-management and personalized pain management in the final strategy.

Conclusions

The content of the final top research priorities' list reflects a holistic approach to pain management. The equal importance given to physical, psychological and social aspects alongside pharmacological treatments highlights the importance of a comprehensive biopsychosocial-orientated research strategy. The expert panel's endorsement of five top priorities, coupled with an emphasis on communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention, self-management and personalized pain management, provides a clear direction for future basic, translational and clinical research.

Significance

EFIC has developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe that identifies pain research areas deserving the most focus and financial support. Implementation and wide dissemination of this Strategy is vital to increase the conduct of urgent pain projects, pain research funding and the implementation of research findings into practice, to ultimately decrease the personal, societal and financial burden of pain.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信