Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha
{"title":"Subtyping strokes using blood-based protein biomarkers: A high-throughput proteomics and machine learning approach.","authors":"Shubham Misra, Praveen Singh, Shantanu Sengupta, Manoj Kushwaha, Zuhaibur Rahman, Divya Bhalla, Pumanshi Talwar, Manabesh Nath, Rahul Chakraborty, Pradeep Kumar, Amit Kumar, Praveen Aggarwal, Achal K Srivastava, Awadh K Pandit, Dheeraj Mohania, Kameshwar Prasad, Nishant K Mishra, Deepti Vibha","doi":"10.1111/eci.14372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Rapid diagnosis of stroke and its subtypes is critical in early stages. We aimed to discover and validate blood-based protein biomarkers to differentiate ischemic stroke (IS) from intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) using high-throughput proteomics.
Methods: We collected serum samples within 24 h from acute stroke (IS & ICH) and mimics patients. In the discovery phase, SWATH-MS proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were validated using targeted proteomics in the validation phase. We conducted interaction network and pathway analyses using Cytoscape 3.10.0. We determined cut-off points using the Youden Index. We developed three prediction models using multivariable logistic regression analyses. We assessed the model performance using statistical tests.
Results: We included 20 IS and 20 ICH in the discovery phase and 150 IS, 150 ICH, and six stroke mimics in the validation phase. We quantified 375 proteins using SWATH-MS. Between IS and ICH, we discovered 20 differentially expressed proteins. In the validation phase, the combined prediction model including three biomarkers: GFAP (aOR 0.04; 95%CI .02-.11), MMP-9 (aOR .09; .03-.28), APO-C1 (aOR 5.76; 2.66-12.47) and clinical variables independently differentiated IS from ICH (accuracy: 92%, negative predictive value: 94%). Adding biomarkers to clinical variables improved discrimination by 26% (p < .001). Additionally, nine biomarkers differentiated IS from ICH within 6 h, while three biomarkers differentiated IS from mimics.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that GFAP, MMP-9 and APO-C1 biomarkers independently differentiated IS from ICH within 24 h and significantly improved the discrimination ability of prediction models. Temporal profiling of these biomarkers in the acute phase of stroke is warranted.
期刊介绍:
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.