{"title":"Multimodal interpersonal synchrony: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shay Ohayon, Ilanit Gordon","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the interplay among neural, physiological, and behavioral interpersonal synchrony. We included studies written in English, comprising human dyads, and reporting data that could be translated to correlation estimates between at least two modalities of synchrony, sourced from PsycINFO, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The initial meta-analysis, examining associations between neural and behavioral synchrony, assessed 37 samples with 1342 participants, revealed a significant medium effect size (r = 0.32, 95 %CI: [0.23, 0.41]) with higher correlations in studies measured frontocentral regions and used the same epoch size for synchrony calculations. The analysis on associations between physiological and behavioral synchrony included 13 samples (369 participants) and identified small effect size (r = 0.18, 95 %CI: [0.06, 0.30]). Due to the limited sample size of three studies involving 150 participants, we conducted a systematic review rather than a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between neural and physiological synchrony. This review revealed inconsistent results, underscoring the need for further research. Future inquiries address greater multimodal integration in certain brain regions and measures, such as frontal and central regions. A theoretical framework that will explain multimodal integration of synchrony will allow us to ascertain if it is a unique aspect of social experiences, or simply a description of synchrony across levels of organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the interplay among neural, physiological, and behavioral interpersonal synchrony. We included studies written in English, comprising human dyads, and reporting data that could be translated to correlation estimates between at least two modalities of synchrony, sourced from PsycINFO, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The initial meta-analysis, examining associations between neural and behavioral synchrony, assessed 37 samples with 1342 participants, revealed a significant medium effect size (r = 0.32, 95 %CI: [0.23, 0.41]) with higher correlations in studies measured frontocentral regions and used the same epoch size for synchrony calculations. The analysis on associations between physiological and behavioral synchrony included 13 samples (369 participants) and identified small effect size (r = 0.18, 95 %CI: [0.06, 0.30]). Due to the limited sample size of three studies involving 150 participants, we conducted a systematic review rather than a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between neural and physiological synchrony. This review revealed inconsistent results, underscoring the need for further research. Future inquiries address greater multimodal integration in certain brain regions and measures, such as frontal and central regions. A theoretical framework that will explain multimodal integration of synchrony will allow us to ascertain if it is a unique aspect of social experiences, or simply a description of synchrony across levels of organization.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.