Early and Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to the Left Main Coronary Artery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohammad Abdelghani, Salma Taha, Osama Shoeib, Kevin Hamzaraj, Amr Y Emam, Khaled M Elmaghraby, Mohamed Elsoudi, Mahmoud Abdelshafy, Robbert J de Winter, Ahmed Elguindy, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Ahmed Hassan
{"title":"Early and Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to the Left Main Coronary Artery.","authors":"Mohammad Abdelghani, Salma Taha, Osama Shoeib, Kevin Hamzaraj, Amr Y Emam, Khaled M Elmaghraby, Mohamed Elsoudi, Mahmoud Abdelshafy, Robbert J de Winter, Ahmed Elguindy, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Ahmed Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the left main (LM) coronary artery in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were not adequately studied in the era of modern PCI. We investigated early and long-term outcomes of these patients, especially those with a true LM bifurcation stenosis. The Left Main Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome (LIMACS) is a multicenter registry that enrolled patients undergoing PCI to unprotected LM disease in the setting of ACS using a drug-eluting stent. The study included 360 patients (age, 65±12 years; male, 74%; STEMI, 65%). During index hospitalization, 25% of patients developed cardiogenic shock and 15% died. Cardiogenic shock (adjOR[95% CI]: 26[7-93]) and final TIMI grade <3 flow (adjOR[95% CI]: 7[1.6-31]) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Three-year mortality (37%) correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction≤40% (adjHR: 2.4[1.4-4.2]), Killip class II-IV at presentation (adjHR: 1.7[1.02-2.8]), LM culprit (adjHR: 1.7[1.04-2.8]), true LM bifurcation stenosis (adjHR: 1.8[1.1-2.9]), final TIMI grade <3 flow (adjHR: 3.2[1.7-5.8]), and radial access (adjHR: 0.58[0.38-0.99]). In patients with true LM bifurcation stenosis (n=127), two-stent strategy was adopted in 60% and was associated with lower 3-year mortality or repeat revascularization compared with one-stent strategy (48% vs. 69%, p=0.012). In conclusion, patients undergoing PCI to the LM in the setting of an ACS sustain high adverse event rates. Hemodynamic status, LM culprit lesion, femoral access, and failure to restore normal flow are major determinants of adverse outcomes. In patients with LM true bifurcation lesions, outcomes are impaired especially with one-stent strategy. Study Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05701319.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the left main (LM) coronary artery in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were not adequately studied in the era of modern PCI. We investigated early and long-term outcomes of these patients, especially those with a true LM bifurcation stenosis. The Left Main Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome (LIMACS) is a multicenter registry that enrolled patients undergoing PCI to unprotected LM disease in the setting of ACS using a drug-eluting stent. The study included 360 patients (age, 65±12 years; male, 74%; STEMI, 65%). During index hospitalization, 25% of patients developed cardiogenic shock and 15% died. Cardiogenic shock (adjOR[95% CI]: 26[7-93]) and final TIMI grade <3 flow (adjOR[95% CI]: 7[1.6-31]) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Three-year mortality (37%) correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction≤40% (adjHR: 2.4[1.4-4.2]), Killip class II-IV at presentation (adjHR: 1.7[1.02-2.8]), LM culprit (adjHR: 1.7[1.04-2.8]), true LM bifurcation stenosis (adjHR: 1.8[1.1-2.9]), final TIMI grade <3 flow (adjHR: 3.2[1.7-5.8]), and radial access (adjHR: 0.58[0.38-0.99]). In patients with true LM bifurcation stenosis (n=127), two-stent strategy was adopted in 60% and was associated with lower 3-year mortality or repeat revascularization compared with one-stent strategy (48% vs. 69%, p=0.012). In conclusion, patients undergoing PCI to the LM in the setting of an ACS sustain high adverse event rates. Hemodynamic status, LM culprit lesion, femoral access, and failure to restore normal flow are major determinants of adverse outcomes. In patients with LM true bifurcation lesions, outcomes are impaired especially with one-stent strategy. Study Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05701319.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信