Evaluating the performance and environmental impact of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer in comparison to OPC-based concrete

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gangapatnam Venkata Prasanna Bhagath Singh, Ventrapragada Durga Prasad
{"title":"Evaluating the performance and environmental impact of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer in comparison to OPC-based concrete","authors":"Gangapatnam Venkata Prasanna Bhagath Singh,&nbsp;Ventrapragada Durga Prasad","doi":"10.1007/s11356-024-35715-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current paper explores the performance, microstructure and environmental consequences of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete compared to OPC-based concrete. The performance of the concrete is assessed based on strength, permeability, sulfate resistance, and acid attack. Two geopolymer mixes were designed by adjusting the binder dosage. The geopolymer concrete mixes achieved 11–16% higher strength than OPC-based concrete. However, increasing the binder dosage from 30 to 40% led to 5% reduction in strength at later ages. Geopolymer concrete demonstrated superior resistance to sulfate and acid attacks, as well as lower penetration depth and permeability coefficient compared to OPC-based concrete. Microstructural analysis was conducted using XRD and SEM techniques, identifying sodium aluminosilicate gel as the product formed during the polymerization process. The environmental impact was evaluated through a life cycle assessment using a cradle-to-gate approach. Geopolymer concrete requires 25–33% less energy and emits 14–28% less kg-CO<sub>2</sub> eq. than OPC-based concrete. The production of OPC-based concrete had the greatest negative environmental impact, except in the categories of metal depletion (MDP) and ionizing radiation (IRP_HE). In geopolymer concrete, the use of alkaline activators accounted for higher energy consumption and accounted for 73–75% kg-CO<sub>2</sub> eq. emissions. Overall, fly ash-based geopolymer concrete showed higher strength and excellent resistance to acid and sulfate attacks, along with a lower carbon footprint and energy consumption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"31 59","pages":"66892 - 66910"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-35715-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current paper explores the performance, microstructure and environmental consequences of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete compared to OPC-based concrete. The performance of the concrete is assessed based on strength, permeability, sulfate resistance, and acid attack. Two geopolymer mixes were designed by adjusting the binder dosage. The geopolymer concrete mixes achieved 11–16% higher strength than OPC-based concrete. However, increasing the binder dosage from 30 to 40% led to 5% reduction in strength at later ages. Geopolymer concrete demonstrated superior resistance to sulfate and acid attacks, as well as lower penetration depth and permeability coefficient compared to OPC-based concrete. Microstructural analysis was conducted using XRD and SEM techniques, identifying sodium aluminosilicate gel as the product formed during the polymerization process. The environmental impact was evaluated through a life cycle assessment using a cradle-to-gate approach. Geopolymer concrete requires 25–33% less energy and emits 14–28% less kg-CO2 eq. than OPC-based concrete. The production of OPC-based concrete had the greatest negative environmental impact, except in the categories of metal depletion (MDP) and ionizing radiation (IRP_HE). In geopolymer concrete, the use of alkaline activators accounted for higher energy consumption and accounted for 73–75% kg-CO2 eq. emissions. Overall, fly ash-based geopolymer concrete showed higher strength and excellent resistance to acid and sulfate attacks, along with a lower carbon footprint and energy consumption.

Abstract Image

评估低钙粉煤灰基地聚合物与opc基混凝土的性能和环境影响。
本文探讨了低钙粉煤灰基地聚合物混凝土与opc基混凝土的性能、微观结构和环境影响。混凝土的性能是根据强度、渗透性、抗硫酸盐性和酸侵蚀来评估的。通过调整粘结剂用量,设计了两种地聚合物混合料。地聚合物混凝土的强度比opc混凝土高11-16%。然而,将粘合剂用量从30%增加到40%,导致后期强度降低5%。与opc基混凝土相比,地聚合物混凝土具有更强的抗硫酸盐和酸侵蚀能力,并且渗透深度和渗透系数更低。采用XRD和SEM技术进行微观结构分析,确定硅酸铝钠凝胶为聚合过程中形成的产物。采用从摇篮到闸门的方法,通过生命周期评估对环境影响进行了评价。与基于opc的混凝土相比,地聚合物混凝土能耗减少25-33%,二氧化碳排放量减少14-28%。除金属损耗(MDP)和电离辐射(IRP_HE)外,opc基混凝土的生产对环境的负面影响最大。在地聚合物混凝土中,碱性活化剂的使用能耗较高,占kg-CO2当量排放量的73-75%。总的来说,粉煤灰基地聚合物混凝土表现出更高的强度和优异的抗酸和硫酸盐侵蚀能力,同时碳足迹和能源消耗也更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信