Refining α-Spodumene with Potassium Sulfate Compared to the Conventional Sulfuric Acid Process

IF 7.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Thamsanqa Ncube, Hans C. Oskierski, Gamini Senanayake, Martin Bertau, Jakub Skut, Juan Canales, Bogdan Z. Dlugogorski
{"title":"Refining α-Spodumene with Potassium Sulfate Compared to the Conventional Sulfuric Acid Process","authors":"Thamsanqa Ncube, Hans C. Oskierski, Gamini Senanayake, Martin Bertau, Jakub Skut, Juan Canales, Bogdan Z. Dlugogorski","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional process of extracting lithium by decrepitating the concentrates of α-spodumene and then baking β-spodumene with concentrated sulfuric acid is the most economic to operate but nonsustainable because of its feedstock, energy, and waste byproduct intensity. Directly extracting lithium from α-spodumene by roasting it with potassium sulfate (K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) followed by leaching it with water offers a more sustainable alternative. We optimized the potassium sulfate process (PSP) at a ratio of K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> to spodumene concentrate of 0.6:1 (w/w), 1050 °C, and 30 min roasting time, achieving a lithium extraction efficiency of 96.3 ± 1.4% (w/w), in comparison to 96.66 ± 0.37% (w/w) for the conventional process, for the same feedstock of spodumene concentrate. While the purification of the leach liquor from PSP is more complex, requiring the addition of aluminum sulfate to recover potassium as potash alum, its byproducts have high economic value. Both processes display a similar energy demand, based on 200 kt y<sup>–1</sup> of the spodumene concentrate feed. The use of aluminum sulfate increases the overall cost of PSP by $12.8 million, but sales of potassium alum elevate the revenue by $45.8 million. We reveal that the key advantage of PSP lies in its capability of leveraging the byproducts (leucite and potash alum), while the sulfuric acid process (SAP) may incur disposal cost for its hydrogen aluminosilicate (HAS) byproduct. For PSP to breakeven with SAP, leucite must be converted to a fertilizer and sold at a price of $102.6 t<sup>–1</sup> if HAS requires no disposal cost. With the process development focused on the byproduct value, the proposed PSP provides an efficient, more sustainable, and potential near zero-waste alternative to the conventional refining of the lithium chemicals from spodumene.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional process of extracting lithium by decrepitating the concentrates of α-spodumene and then baking β-spodumene with concentrated sulfuric acid is the most economic to operate but nonsustainable because of its feedstock, energy, and waste byproduct intensity. Directly extracting lithium from α-spodumene by roasting it with potassium sulfate (K2SO4) followed by leaching it with water offers a more sustainable alternative. We optimized the potassium sulfate process (PSP) at a ratio of K2SO4 to spodumene concentrate of 0.6:1 (w/w), 1050 °C, and 30 min roasting time, achieving a lithium extraction efficiency of 96.3 ± 1.4% (w/w), in comparison to 96.66 ± 0.37% (w/w) for the conventional process, for the same feedstock of spodumene concentrate. While the purification of the leach liquor from PSP is more complex, requiring the addition of aluminum sulfate to recover potassium as potash alum, its byproducts have high economic value. Both processes display a similar energy demand, based on 200 kt y–1 of the spodumene concentrate feed. The use of aluminum sulfate increases the overall cost of PSP by $12.8 million, but sales of potassium alum elevate the revenue by $45.8 million. We reveal that the key advantage of PSP lies in its capability of leveraging the byproducts (leucite and potash alum), while the sulfuric acid process (SAP) may incur disposal cost for its hydrogen aluminosilicate (HAS) byproduct. For PSP to breakeven with SAP, leucite must be converted to a fertilizer and sold at a price of $102.6 t–1 if HAS requires no disposal cost. With the process development focused on the byproduct value, the proposed PSP provides an efficient, more sustainable, and potential near zero-waste alternative to the conventional refining of the lithium chemicals from spodumene.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信