The Role of Edmonton Frailty Scale in Determining the Postoperative Complications in Elderly: A Prospective Observational Study.

Seyda Canli, Cem Ece, Fulya Yilmaz Barut
{"title":"The Role of Edmonton Frailty Scale in Determining the Postoperative Complications in Elderly: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Seyda Canli, Cem Ece, Fulya Yilmaz Barut","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.12.1518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of Edmonton Frailty Index on the determination of postoperative complication and mortality rates in patients over 65 years of age.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye, from January to July 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Patients aged >65 years undergoing surgery were inducted. Frailty was defined as a multisystemic condition in which physical, physiological, and cognitive abilities are reduced. Demographic data, ASA, and Edmonton Frailty Test Score (EFS) were noted preoperatively. Subsequently, these patients were followed perioperatively and evaluated by Clavien-Dindo test (CDT) during the first month postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between genders, except EFS, which was higher in females than in males. EFS increased as age increased with a statistically significant positive correlation. The patients with the highest EFS underwent neurosurgical operations. There was a statistically significant and positive correlation between the length of hospital stay and EFS. EFS values increased as the ASA score increased and the positive correlation was statistically significant. The mild frality group had the highest CDT scores and were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty assessed by EFS has a statistically significant correlation with ASA and the CDT scores of the patients. EFS value was associated with length of hospital stay, unlike the ASA score. Both EFS and ASA were correlated with the CDT. Preoperative evaluation, especially in geriatric patients, is very important in determining postoperative complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Edmonton frailty index, Clavien-Dindo scoring, American society of anaesthesiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 12","pages":"1518-1523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.12.1518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of Edmonton Frailty Index on the determination of postoperative complication and mortality rates in patients over 65 years of age.

Study design: An observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkiye, from January to July 2021.

Methodology: Patients aged >65 years undergoing surgery were inducted. Frailty was defined as a multisystemic condition in which physical, physiological, and cognitive abilities are reduced. Demographic data, ASA, and Edmonton Frailty Test Score (EFS) were noted preoperatively. Subsequently, these patients were followed perioperatively and evaluated by Clavien-Dindo test (CDT) during the first month postoperatively.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between genders, except EFS, which was higher in females than in males. EFS increased as age increased with a statistically significant positive correlation. The patients with the highest EFS underwent neurosurgical operations. There was a statistically significant and positive correlation between the length of hospital stay and EFS. EFS values increased as the ASA score increased and the positive correlation was statistically significant. The mild frality group had the highest CDT scores and were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Frailty assessed by EFS has a statistically significant correlation with ASA and the CDT scores of the patients. EFS value was associated with length of hospital stay, unlike the ASA score. Both EFS and ASA were correlated with the CDT. Preoperative evaluation, especially in geriatric patients, is very important in determining postoperative complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Key words: Edmonton frailty index, Clavien-Dindo scoring, American society of anaesthesiologists.

埃德蒙顿衰弱量表在确定老年人术后并发症中的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:探讨埃德蒙顿衰弱指数对65岁以上患者术后并发症及死亡率的影响。研究设计:观察性研究。研究地点和时间:2021年1月至7月,土耳其伊兹密尔伊兹密尔博扎卡培训和研究医院卫生科学大学麻醉和复苏学系。方法:选取年龄在bb0 ~ 65岁的手术患者。虚弱被定义为身体、生理和认知能力下降的多系统状况。术前记录人口统计数据、ASA和埃德蒙顿虚弱测试评分(EFS)。随后,这些患者围手术期随访,并在术后第一个月进行Clavien-Dindo试验(CDT)评估。结果:除EFS女性高于男性外,性别间差异无统计学意义。EFS随年龄增加而增加,呈显著正相关。EFS最高的患者接受神经外科手术。住院时间与EFS有统计学显著正相关。EFS值随ASA评分的升高而升高,且正相关有统计学意义。轻度病死率组CDT评分最高,差异有统计学意义。结论:EFS评价的衰弱程度与ASA、CDT评分有统计学意义。与ASA评分不同,EFS值与住院时间有关。EFS和ASA均与CDT相关。术前评估,尤其是老年患者,对于确定术后并发症、死亡率和住院时间非常重要。关键词:Edmonton衰弱指数,Clavien-Dindo评分,美国麻醉师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信