Does the Lens Deflection Angle Affect Laparoscopic Camera Navigation?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yi Luo, Ziyan Chen, Bin Luo, Jacques Hubert, Xinghuan Wang, Ming Xu, Kun Yang
{"title":"Does the Lens Deflection Angle Affect Laparoscopic Camera Navigation?","authors":"Yi Luo, Ziyan Chen, Bin Luo, Jacques Hubert, Xinghuan Wang, Ming Xu, Kun Yang","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In laparoscopic surgery, a 30° lens is frequently used to obtain a wider field of view. However, it is difficult for inexperienced surgeons to maintain the horizontal state of the image in laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN). If there is a great deviation in the camera's horizontal axis, it may result in ambiguous anatomical recognition, which could impair patient safety. Scientific assessment of the degree of camera's horizontal axis deflection in camera holders with differing proficiencies is necessary for improving novice surgeons' fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. This study aims to develop an evaluation and training system based on the deflection angle (refers to the change in the angle of the camera axis from its preset vertical position) and assess its potential value in the training and clinical application of laparoscopic surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 15 postgraduates without laparoscopic surgery experience and 15 skilled senior attending physicians with an experience in more than 50 cases of laparoscopic surgery were recruited. The participants completed an LCN exercise. An inclinometer module was used to measure the camera's horizontal axis deflection angle and the difference in the deviation angle was compared between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A deflection angle greater than ±15° was found in 57.98% and 31.76% of participants in the novice group and skilled group, respectively, whereas a deflection angle greater than ±30° was found in 18.4% and 7.58% of participants in the novice group and the skilled group, respectively. The thresholds (we designate 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° as the checkpoints) for all angles were significantly different for the two groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There was a significant difference in the technique of maintaining the camera's horizontal axis within an acceptable range between the novice and the skilled participants. Training that focuses on this deflection angle may be helpful for novice camera holders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In laparoscopic surgery, a 30° lens is frequently used to obtain a wider field of view. However, it is difficult for inexperienced surgeons to maintain the horizontal state of the image in laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN). If there is a great deviation in the camera's horizontal axis, it may result in ambiguous anatomical recognition, which could impair patient safety. Scientific assessment of the degree of camera's horizontal axis deflection in camera holders with differing proficiencies is necessary for improving novice surgeons' fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. This study aims to develop an evaluation and training system based on the deflection angle (refers to the change in the angle of the camera axis from its preset vertical position) and assess its potential value in the training and clinical application of laparoscopic surgery. Methods: A total of 15 postgraduates without laparoscopic surgery experience and 15 skilled senior attending physicians with an experience in more than 50 cases of laparoscopic surgery were recruited. The participants completed an LCN exercise. An inclinometer module was used to measure the camera's horizontal axis deflection angle and the difference in the deviation angle was compared between the two groups. Results: A deflection angle greater than ±15° was found in 57.98% and 31.76% of participants in the novice group and skilled group, respectively, whereas a deflection angle greater than ±30° was found in 18.4% and 7.58% of participants in the novice group and the skilled group, respectively. The thresholds (we designate 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° as the checkpoints) for all angles were significantly different for the two groups. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the technique of maintaining the camera's horizontal axis within an acceptable range between the novice and the skilled participants. Training that focuses on this deflection angle may be helpful for novice camera holders.

镜头偏转角度影响腹腔镜摄像机导航吗?
背景:在腹腔镜手术中,经常使用 30° 镜头来获得更宽的视野。然而,缺乏经验的外科医生很难在腹腔镜摄像导航(LCN)中保持图像的水平状态。如果摄像头的水平轴出现较大偏差,可能会导致解剖识别模糊,从而影响患者安全。为了提高新手外科医生的腹腔镜手术基础,有必要对不同熟练程度的相机持有者的相机水平轴偏移程度进行科学评估。本研究旨在开发一套基于偏转角度(指摄像机轴线从其预设垂直位置的角度变化)的评估和培训系统,并评估其在腹腔镜手术培训和临床应用中的潜在价值。研究方法共招募了 15 名没有腹腔镜手术经验的研究生和 15 名熟练的、有 50 例以上腹腔镜手术经验的资深主治医师。参与者完成了 LCN 训练。使用倾角仪模块测量摄像头的水平轴偏转角,比较两组偏转角的差异。结果显示新手组和熟练组分别有 57.98% 和 31.76% 的参与者发现偏转角度大于±15°,而新手组和熟练组分别有 18.4% 和 7.58% 的参与者发现偏转角度大于±30°。所有角度的阈值(我们指定 15°、30°、45° 和 60°为检查点)在两组中均有显著差异。结论:新手和熟练学员在将摄像机水平轴保持在可接受范围内的技术上存在明显差异。针对这一偏转角度的培训可能会对新手相机持有者有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信