Active motor-cognitive recovery supports reactive agility performance in trained athletes

Thorben Hülsdünker, Joe Koster, Andreas Mierau
{"title":"Active motor-cognitive recovery supports reactive agility performance in trained athletes","authors":"Thorben Hülsdünker,&nbsp;Joe Koster,&nbsp;Andreas Mierau","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Active breaks are suggested to support recovery and performance in sports. Previous research in ball and team sports focused on motor performance such as repetitive sprinting or change of direction. This does not account for the interaction between motor and cognitive task demands in sports. Therefore, this study is the first to investigate the effectiveness of an active motor-cognitive break to support reactive agility performance. Twenty (7 female and 13 male) healthy trained young adults (mean age: 26 years) performed an active or passive 5 min break following a fatiguing protocol of six 100 m reactive agility runs with an intermittent break of 40 s. Prior to the experiment (pre), after fatigue (post), and following the rest condition (retention), a reactive agility test was performed using the SKILLCOURT technology. In addition, lactate, heartrate, and physical exertion were recorded. Active rest contained two motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT combining low to moderate physical intensity with conflict inhibition and decision-making. During passive rest, participants remained seated. When comparing post and retention agility tests, results indicate significantly stronger performance gains following the active when compared to the passive break condition (<i>p</i> = 0.02 and <i>η</i><sub><i>p</i></sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.24). This was not associated with any differences in physiological parameters such as lactate, heart rate, or RPE (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.25). The results suggest that active motor-cognitive breaks support recovery and improve sport-related reactive agility performance. Performance gains in the active break are likely attributable to cognitive performance effects rather than physiological recovery, which may benefit athletes especially in ball and team sports.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active breaks are suggested to support recovery and performance in sports. Previous research in ball and team sports focused on motor performance such as repetitive sprinting or change of direction. This does not account for the interaction between motor and cognitive task demands in sports. Therefore, this study is the first to investigate the effectiveness of an active motor-cognitive break to support reactive agility performance. Twenty (7 female and 13 male) healthy trained young adults (mean age: 26 years) performed an active or passive 5 min break following a fatiguing protocol of six 100 m reactive agility runs with an intermittent break of 40 s. Prior to the experiment (pre), after fatigue (post), and following the rest condition (retention), a reactive agility test was performed using the SKILLCOURT technology. In addition, lactate, heartrate, and physical exertion were recorded. Active rest contained two motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT combining low to moderate physical intensity with conflict inhibition and decision-making. During passive rest, participants remained seated. When comparing post and retention agility tests, results indicate significantly stronger performance gains following the active when compared to the passive break condition (p = 0.02 and ηp2 = 0.24). This was not associated with any differences in physiological parameters such as lactate, heart rate, or RPE (p ≥ 0.25). The results suggest that active motor-cognitive breaks support recovery and improve sport-related reactive agility performance. Performance gains in the active break are likely attributable to cognitive performance effects rather than physiological recovery, which may benefit athletes especially in ball and team sports.

Abstract Image

积极的运动-认知恢复支持训练有素的运动员反应性敏捷性表现。
建议主动休息,以支持恢复和表现的运动。先前对球类和团队运动的研究侧重于运动表现,如重复冲刺或改变方向。这并不能解释运动中运动和认知任务需求之间的相互作用。因此,本研究首次调查了主动运动-认知休息对支持反应性敏捷性表现的有效性。20名(7名女性和13名男性)健康训练的年轻人(平均年龄:26岁)在6次100米反应性敏捷跑的疲劳方案后进行主动或被动的5分钟休息,间歇休息40秒。在实验前(预)、疲劳后(后)和休息后(保持),使用SKILLCOURT技术进行反应敏捷性测试。此外,还记录了乳酸、心率和体力消耗。主动休息包含SKILLCOURT上的两个运动-认知训练任务,结合低至中等强度的身体强度与冲突抑制和决策。在被动休息期间,参与者保持坐姿。当比较后和保留敏捷性测试时,结果表明,与被动中断条件相比,主动中断条件下的性能提高明显更强(p = 0.02和ηp 2 = 0.24)。这与生理参数如乳酸、心率或RPE的任何差异无关(p≥0.25)。结果表明,积极的运动认知休息支持恢复和提高运动相关的反应敏捷性表现。在主动休息中,表现的提高可能是由于认知表现的影响,而不是生理恢复,这可能有利于运动员,特别是在球类和团队运动中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信