The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheaths on Radiation Exposure in the Ureterorenoscopic Treatment of Urolithiasis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Lennert Eismann, Severin Rodler, Alexander Buchner, Frank Strittmatter, Abdulmajeed Alghamdi, Simon Lennartz, Jan-Peter Grunz, Raphaela Waidelich, Armin Becker, Philipp Weinhold, Alexander Kretschmer, Christian G Stief, Thilo Westhofen
{"title":"The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheaths on Radiation Exposure in the Ureterorenoscopic Treatment of Urolithiasis.","authors":"Lennert Eismann, Severin Rodler, Alexander Buchner, Frank Strittmatter, Abdulmajeed Alghamdi, Simon Lennartz, Jan-Peter Grunz, Raphaela Waidelich, Armin Becker, Philipp Weinhold, Alexander Kretschmer, Christian G Stief, Thilo Westhofen","doi":"10.1159/000542945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are widely used in the endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis. In modern medicine, radiation exposure from diagnostics and therapy is increasing; however, the impact of UAS on procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and radiation exposure is still uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 1,026 patients who received ureterorenoscopic treatment for nephrolithiasis between 2016 and 2018 at a large academic center. Patients were dichotomized according to the use of UAS, and propensity-score matching was performed based on age, BMI, and stone size. Patient demographics, stone size, radiographic density, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcome were assessed. Procedure time and radiation exposure, recorded as the fluoroscopy time and area dose product, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 300 patients were successfully matched to the cohort with UAS (n = 150) and the cohort without UAS (n = 150). Patients' demographics were similar for age, gender, BMI, and ASA score (each p > 0.05). Median stone size was 8 mm and 7.5 mm in the cohort with and without UAS (p = 0.335). Procedure time showed no differences between the two cohorts (p = 0.749). Fluoroscopy time and area dose product were significantly lower in patients treated with the use of UAS (p = 0.004; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a UAS does not prolong operation time in patients with an equivalent stone burden. In addition, the use of a UAS reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure. In the future, to reduce radiation exposure to the patient and medical staff, the use of a UAS should also be considered for limited stone disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are widely used in the endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis. In modern medicine, radiation exposure from diagnostics and therapy is increasing; however, the impact of UAS on procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and radiation exposure is still uncertain.

Methods: This retrospective study included 1,026 patients who received ureterorenoscopic treatment for nephrolithiasis between 2016 and 2018 at a large academic center. Patients were dichotomized according to the use of UAS, and propensity-score matching was performed based on age, BMI, and stone size. Patient demographics, stone size, radiographic density, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcome were assessed. Procedure time and radiation exposure, recorded as the fluoroscopy time and area dose product, were analyzed.

Results: In total, 300 patients were successfully matched to the cohort with UAS (n = 150) and the cohort without UAS (n = 150). Patients' demographics were similar for age, gender, BMI, and ASA score (each p > 0.05). Median stone size was 8 mm and 7.5 mm in the cohort with and without UAS (p = 0.335). Procedure time showed no differences between the two cohorts (p = 0.749). Fluoroscopy time and area dose product were significantly lower in patients treated with the use of UAS (p = 0.004; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of a UAS does not prolong operation time in patients with an equivalent stone burden. In addition, the use of a UAS reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure. In the future, to reduce radiation exposure to the patient and medical staff, the use of a UAS should also be considered for limited stone disease.

输尿管通路鞘对输尿管肾镜治疗尿路结石过程中辐射照射的影响。
导读:输尿管导管鞘(UAS)广泛应用于内镜下治疗尿石症。在现代医学中,来自诊断和治疗的辐射暴露正在增加;然而,UAS对手术时间、透视时间和辐射暴露的影响仍不确定。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2016年至2018年在某大型学术中心接受输尿管镜治疗的1026例尿石症患者。根据UAS的使用对患者进行二分类,并根据年龄、BMI和结石大小进行倾向评分匹配。评估患者人口统计学、结石大小、x线密度、围手术期并发症和术后结果。分析了记录为透视时间和面积剂量积的手术时间和辐射暴露。结果:共有300例患者成功匹配到有UAS的队列(n=150)和没有UAS的队列(n=150)。患者的年龄、性别、BMI和ASA评分相似(p < 0.05)。在有无UAS的队列中,中位结石大小分别为8mm和7.5mm (p=0.335)。手术时间在两个队列间无差异(p=0.749)。使用UAS治疗的患者透视时间和面积剂量积均显著降低(p=0.004;结论:在结石负荷相当的患者中,使用UAS不会延长手术时间。此外,使用无人机减少了透视时间和辐射暴露。将来,为了减少对患者和医务人员的辐射暴露,也应考虑在有限的结石疾病中使用UAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信