Cardiologists vs Endocrinologists in Glycemic Control for Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S494004
Qin Xia, Qianwen Peng, Hefeng Chen, Weixia Zhang
{"title":"Cardiologists vs Endocrinologists in Glycemic Control for Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Qin Xia, Qianwen Peng, Hefeng Chen, Weixia Zhang","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S494004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The comorbidity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presents significant challenges in clinical management, particularly regarding glycemic control. The clinical management of CAD complicated by T2DM requires coordinated glycemic control, as poor management can exacerbate cardiovascular risks and increase morbidity and mortality. While endocrinologists traditionally manage diabetes, cardiologists are increasingly involved due to the cardiovascular risks associated with poor glycemic control. This study explores the current practices of glycemic management by cardiologists and endocrinologists in patients with CAD and T2DM, focusing on treatment intensification in a Chinese hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 1,074 hospitalized patients with both CAD and T2DM, admitted to the Cardiology Department of Ruijin Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records, including demographic information, clinical characteristics, and treatment interventions. Patients were stratified by year, and differences in treatment strategies between cardiologists and endocrinologists were analyzed. Glycemic control was assessed using HbA1c levels, with treatment intensification defined by any adjustment in antidiabetic therapy and consideration for comprehensive cardiovascular risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endocrinologists were significantly more likely to initiate treatment intensification, especially in cases of severe hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥9.0%), while cardiologists' role in glycemic management was limited, with a preference for outpatient endocrinology referrals over in-hospital adjustments. Despite improvements in glycemic control, the percentage of patients achieving comprehensive cardiovascular risk management targets remained low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscored the distinct yet complementary roles of cardiologists and endocrinologists in managing glycemic control among patients with CAD and T2DM, noting endocrinologists' more active involvement in treatment intensification. Future integrated care models should harness the unique expertise of both specialties to optimize patient outcomes, better address glycemic control needs, and enhance overall cardiovascular risk management in this high-risk patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5715-5723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S494004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The comorbidity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presents significant challenges in clinical management, particularly regarding glycemic control. The clinical management of CAD complicated by T2DM requires coordinated glycemic control, as poor management can exacerbate cardiovascular risks and increase morbidity and mortality. While endocrinologists traditionally manage diabetes, cardiologists are increasingly involved due to the cardiovascular risks associated with poor glycemic control. This study explores the current practices of glycemic management by cardiologists and endocrinologists in patients with CAD and T2DM, focusing on treatment intensification in a Chinese hospital setting.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1,074 hospitalized patients with both CAD and T2DM, admitted to the Cardiology Department of Ruijin Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records, including demographic information, clinical characteristics, and treatment interventions. Patients were stratified by year, and differences in treatment strategies between cardiologists and endocrinologists were analyzed. Glycemic control was assessed using HbA1c levels, with treatment intensification defined by any adjustment in antidiabetic therapy and consideration for comprehensive cardiovascular risk factors.

Results: Endocrinologists were significantly more likely to initiate treatment intensification, especially in cases of severe hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥9.0%), while cardiologists' role in glycemic management was limited, with a preference for outpatient endocrinology referrals over in-hospital adjustments. Despite improvements in glycemic control, the percentage of patients achieving comprehensive cardiovascular risk management targets remained low.

Conclusion: This study underscored the distinct yet complementary roles of cardiologists and endocrinologists in managing glycemic control among patients with CAD and T2DM, noting endocrinologists' more active involvement in treatment intensification. Future integrated care models should harness the unique expertise of both specialties to optimize patient outcomes, better address glycemic control needs, and enhance overall cardiovascular risk management in this high-risk patient population.

冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的心脏病专家与内分泌专家:一项横断面研究
背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)的合并症在临床管理中提出了重大挑战,特别是在血糖控制方面。CAD合并T2DM的临床管理需要协调血糖控制,因为管理不善会加剧心血管风险,增加发病率和死亡率。虽然传统上由内分泌学家管理糖尿病,但由于与血糖控制不良相关的心血管风险,心脏病学家越来越多地参与其中。本研究探讨了目前冠心病和2型糖尿病患者中心脏病专家和内分泌专家的血糖管理实践,重点是中国医院的治疗强化。方法:本横断面研究纳入2021年1月至2023年12月瑞金医院心内科收治的1074例冠心病和T2DM住院患者。回顾性收集电子病历数据,包括人口统计信息、临床特征和治疗干预措施。患者按年分层,分析心脏科医生和内分泌科医生治疗策略的差异。使用HbA1c水平评估血糖控制,通过调整降糖治疗和综合心血管危险因素来确定治疗强度。结果:内分泌科医生更有可能启动强化治疗,特别是在严重高血糖(HbA1c≥9.0%)的情况下,而心脏病科医生在血糖管理中的作用有限,他们更倾向于门诊内分泌科转诊,而不是住院调整。尽管血糖控制有所改善,但达到全面心血管风险管理目标的患者比例仍然很低。结论:本研究强调了心内科医生和内分泌科医生在冠心病和2型糖尿病患者血糖控制中的独特但互补的作用,并指出内分泌科医生更积极地参与治疗强化。未来的综合护理模式应该利用这两个专业的独特专长来优化患者的预后,更好地解决血糖控制需求,并加强这一高危患者群体的整体心血管风险管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信