Causal association between glaucoma and risk of retinal vascular occlusion: a Mendelian randomization study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zixun Wang, Kaihua Xu, Xiaoling Zhang, Ruihua Wei, Zhiqing Li
{"title":"Causal association between glaucoma and risk of retinal vascular occlusion: a Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Zixun Wang, Kaihua Xu, Xiaoling Zhang, Ruihua Wei, Zhiqing Li","doi":"10.1177/03000605241286985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) leads to visual impairment, and risk factors may include glaucoma. Although some studies suggest a relationship between glaucoma and RVO, it is unknown whether this association is causal. We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to evaluate the causal contribution to RVO of five genetically predicted glaucoma conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two-sample univariable MR analysis using inverse variance weighting, weighted median, and MR-Egger methods. We obtained publicly available datasets of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) meta-analyses for glaucoma as the exposure and a GWAS for RVO in the Finn Gen biobank study as the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetically predicted glaucoma was causally associated with RVO risk (beta = 0.267, standard error [SE] = 0.052, odds ratio [OR] = 1.306, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.181-1.445). This association was supported by sensitivity analyses using weighted median (beta = 0.211, SE = 0.075, OR = 1.235, 95% CI: 1.067-1.429), weighted mode (beta = 0.491, SE = 0.132, OR = 1.633, 95% CI: 1.261-2.116), and MR-Egger (beta = 0.3900, SE = 0.138, OR = 1.476, 95% CI: 1.128-1.933) methods. MR analyses using the validation dataset obtained consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated that glaucoma is likely causally associated with an increased risk of RVO. The current findings may help in determining the underlying mechanisms via which glaucoma affects the risk of RVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"52 12","pages":"3000605241286985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241286985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) leads to visual impairment, and risk factors may include glaucoma. Although some studies suggest a relationship between glaucoma and RVO, it is unknown whether this association is causal. We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to evaluate the causal contribution to RVO of five genetically predicted glaucoma conditions.

Methods: We conducted two-sample univariable MR analysis using inverse variance weighting, weighted median, and MR-Egger methods. We obtained publicly available datasets of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) meta-analyses for glaucoma as the exposure and a GWAS for RVO in the Finn Gen biobank study as the outcome.

Results: Genetically predicted glaucoma was causally associated with RVO risk (beta = 0.267, standard error [SE] = 0.052, odds ratio [OR] = 1.306, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.181-1.445). This association was supported by sensitivity analyses using weighted median (beta = 0.211, SE = 0.075, OR = 1.235, 95% CI: 1.067-1.429), weighted mode (beta = 0.491, SE = 0.132, OR = 1.633, 95% CI: 1.261-2.116), and MR-Egger (beta = 0.3900, SE = 0.138, OR = 1.476, 95% CI: 1.128-1.933) methods. MR analyses using the validation dataset obtained consistent results.

Conclusion: Our results indicated that glaucoma is likely causally associated with an increased risk of RVO. The current findings may help in determining the underlying mechanisms via which glaucoma affects the risk of RVO.

青光眼与视网膜血管闭塞风险的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机研究。
目的:视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)导致视力损害,其危险因素可能包括青光眼。虽然一些研究表明青光眼和RVO之间存在联系,但这种联系是否有因果关系尚不清楚。我们进行了孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以评估五种遗传预测的青光眼状况对RVO的因果贡献。方法:采用方差反加权、加权中位数和MR- egger方法进行两样本单变量MR分析。我们获得了青光眼暴露的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)荟萃分析的公开数据集,以及芬兰Gen生物银行研究中RVO的GWAS数据集。结果:基因预测青光眼与RVO风险有因果关系(β = 0.267,标准误差[SE] = 0.052,优势比[OR] = 1.306, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.181-1.445)。采用加权中位数(beta = 0.211, SE = 0.075, OR = 1.235, 95% CI: 1.067-1.429)、加权模式(beta = 0.491, SE = 0.132, OR = 1.633, 95% CI: 1.251 -2.116)和MR-Egger (beta = 0.3900, SE = 0.138, OR = 1.476, 95% CI: 1.128-1.933)方法进行敏感性分析支持这种关联。使用验证数据集的MR分析得到了一致的结果。结论:我们的研究结果表明青光眼可能与RVO风险增加有因果关系。目前的研究结果可能有助于确定青光眼影响RVO风险的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信