Colorectal cancer screening based on fecal immunochemical test and risk assessment: a population-based study including two million participants in China.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dong Hang, Chen Zhu, Xiaolin Yang, Jinjin He, Huizhang Li, Tingting Pan, Le Wang, Shi Wang, Wei Wu, Jieming Zhong, Weiwei Gong, Meng Zhu, Ci Song, Hongxia Ma, Ni Li, Yanfei Qiu, Guangfu Jin, Zhibin Hu, Lingbin Du, Xiangdong Cheng, Hongbing Shen
{"title":"Colorectal cancer screening based on fecal immunochemical test and risk assessment: a population-based study including two million participants in China.","authors":"Dong Hang, Chen Zhu, Xiaolin Yang, Jinjin He, Huizhang Li, Tingting Pan, Le Wang, Shi Wang, Wei Wu, Jieming Zhong, Weiwei Gong, Meng Zhu, Ci Song, Hongxia Ma, Ni Li, Yanfei Qiu, Guangfu Jin, Zhibin Hu, Lingbin Du, Xiangdong Cheng, Hongbing Shen","doi":"10.2188/jea.JE20240252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet the practical performance of FIT combined with questionnaire-based risk assessment (QRA) remains undetermined. Moreover, risk factors for distinct CRC precursors identified in screening have been rarely compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was based on a population-based CRC screening in China, with 2,120,340 participants completing both FIT and QRA. Those with positive FIT or high QRA scores were recommended for colonoscopy. We reported the compliance, detection rate, and colonoscopy workload according to FIT and QRA results. We also explored risk factors for conventional adenomas and serrated polyps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The compliance rate of colonoscopy in the subgroup of FIT (+) and QRA (+) was 41.4%, higher than the rates in FIT (+) and QRA (-), as well as FIT (-) and QRA (+), which were 38.7% (P<0.001) and 16.4% (P<0.001), respectively. The corresponding detection rates of advanced neoplasia were 18.2%, 13.2%, and 9.3% (all P <0.001), respectively. Moreover, the required numbers of colonoscopies to detect one advanced neoplasia in the three subgroups were 5.5, 7.6, and 10.8, respectively. Increased body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat intake, and type 2 diabetes were associated with higher risk of advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps, whereas vegetable intake was inversely associated advanced adenomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FIT and QRA can synergistically identify individuals at high risk of colorectal advanced neoplasia, with those testing positive for both deserving immediate attention. Modifiable factors were identified to complement screening for preventing CRC precursors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20240252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet the practical performance of FIT combined with questionnaire-based risk assessment (QRA) remains undetermined. Moreover, risk factors for distinct CRC precursors identified in screening have been rarely compared.

Methods: This study was based on a population-based CRC screening in China, with 2,120,340 participants completing both FIT and QRA. Those with positive FIT or high QRA scores were recommended for colonoscopy. We reported the compliance, detection rate, and colonoscopy workload according to FIT and QRA results. We also explored risk factors for conventional adenomas and serrated polyps.

Results: The compliance rate of colonoscopy in the subgroup of FIT (+) and QRA (+) was 41.4%, higher than the rates in FIT (+) and QRA (-), as well as FIT (-) and QRA (+), which were 38.7% (P<0.001) and 16.4% (P<0.001), respectively. The corresponding detection rates of advanced neoplasia were 18.2%, 13.2%, and 9.3% (all P <0.001), respectively. Moreover, the required numbers of colonoscopies to detect one advanced neoplasia in the three subgroups were 5.5, 7.6, and 10.8, respectively. Increased body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, red meat intake, and type 2 diabetes were associated with higher risk of advanced adenomas and advanced serrated polyps, whereas vegetable intake was inversely associated advanced adenomas.

Conclusion: FIT and QRA can synergistically identify individuals at high risk of colorectal advanced neoplasia, with those testing positive for both deserving immediate attention. Modifiable factors were identified to complement screening for preventing CRC precursors.

基于粪便免疫化学测试和风险评估的结直肠癌筛查:一项包括中国200万参与者的基于人群的研究
背景:粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)已广泛应用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,但FIT结合基于问卷的风险评估(QRA)的实际性能尚不确定。此外,在筛查中发现的不同CRC前体的危险因素很少进行比较。方法:本研究基于中国基于人群的CRC筛查,共有2,120,340名参与者完成了FIT和QRA。建议FIT阳性或QRA评分高的患者行结肠镜检查。我们根据FIT和QRA结果报告了依从性、检出率和结肠镜检查工作量。我们也探讨了传统腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的危险因素。结果:FIT(+)和QRA(+)亚组结肠镜检查依从率为41.4%,高于FIT(+)和QRA(-)亚组,高于FIT(-)和QRA(+)亚组的38.7% (p结论:FIT和QRA可协同识别结直肠癌晚期肿瘤高危人群,两者检测均阳性者应引起高度重视。确定了可改变的因素,以补充预防CRC前体的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology
Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology is the official open access scientific journal of the Japan Epidemiological Association. The Journal publishes a broad range of original research on epidemiology as it relates to human health, and aims to promote communication among those engaged in the field of epidemiological research and those who use epidemiological findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信