Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the two-minute step test for assessing aerobic exercise capacity and functional endurance in participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Caner Kararti, Fatih Özyurt, Ömer Alperen Gürses, Hakki Çağdaş Basat, İsmail Özsoy, Sümeyye Erol, Kubra Caylan Gurses
{"title":"Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the two-minute step test for assessing aerobic exercise capacity and functional endurance in participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Caner Kararti, Fatih Özyurt, Ömer Alperen Gürses, Hakki Çağdaş Basat, İsmail Özsoy, Sümeyye Erol, Kubra Caylan Gurses","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the 2-min step test (2MST) in measuring aerobic exercise capacity and functional endurance in participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Fifty participants with quadriceps tendon autograft, bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, or hamstring autograft were included. Feasibility was assessed by the time and support required to complete the measures and the feedback from participants, including their satisfaction ratings. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), a Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (LoA), SEM, SEM%, and minimum detectable change (MDC95). The participants were assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), stair climbing test (SCT), and 6-min walk test to assess construct validity. The test took less than 5 min to describe and perform, and participants required minimal verbal support. The satisfaction rate was notably high. The ICC2,1 was 0.98 (0.96-0.99). SEM and MDC95 were 2.96 and 8.20 (2.41-14.00), respectively. The SEM% of 2.99 was considered to be at a very good level. The Bland-Altman plot illustrates that the 2MST scores had a 95% LoA ranging from -21.52 to 2.68 steps. The SCT score and VAS rest score were found to be associated with the 2MST performance, explaining 42.5% of the variance. The 2MST is a feasible, reliable, and valid test to measure aerobic exercise capacity and functional endurance in participants with ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the 2-min step test (2MST) in measuring aerobic exercise capacity and functional endurance in participants with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Fifty participants with quadriceps tendon autograft, bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, or hamstring autograft were included. Feasibility was assessed by the time and support required to complete the measures and the feedback from participants, including their satisfaction ratings. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), a Bland-Altman plot with 95% limits of agreement (LoA), SEM, SEM%, and minimum detectable change (MDC95). The participants were assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), stair climbing test (SCT), and 6-min walk test to assess construct validity. The test took less than 5 min to describe and perform, and participants required minimal verbal support. The satisfaction rate was notably high. The ICC2,1 was 0.98 (0.96-0.99). SEM and MDC95 were 2.96 and 8.20 (2.41-14.00), respectively. The SEM% of 2.99 was considered to be at a very good level. The Bland-Altman plot illustrates that the 2MST scores had a 95% LoA ranging from -21.52 to 2.68 steps. The SCT score and VAS rest score were found to be associated with the 2MST performance, explaining 42.5% of the variance. The 2MST is a feasible, reliable, and valid test to measure aerobic exercise capacity and functional endurance in participants with ACLR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信