Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis.
{"title":"Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Mika Karsikas, Mikhail Saltychev, Juhani Juhola","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to detect a possible age-related differential item functioning (DIF) of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among people with musculoskeletal disorders. This was a cross-sectional study of 1739 consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain at a university clinic. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were calculated for each of 12 items of the WHODAS 2.0 using item response theory. The presence of DIF was assessed both numerically and graphically. When considering differences in both difficulty and discrimination, a statistically significant DIF was observed for all the items except for the item 'washing' (P values <0.001). The DIF was mostly uniform. Items 'standing', 'household responsibilities', 'learning a new task', 'emotional affectedness', 'concentrating', 'washing' and 'dressing' showed better precision among older patients. Items 'walking', 'dealing with strangers', 'maintaining a friendship' and 'day-to-day work' were more informative among younger patients. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were alike for all 12 items. The DIF was mostly uniform. These results can be taken into account when applying the WHODAS 2.0 to people with musculoskeletal complaints, especially when the studied groups are predominated by people of certain age.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"276-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to detect a possible age-related differential item functioning (DIF) of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among people with musculoskeletal disorders. This was a cross-sectional study of 1739 consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain at a university clinic. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were calculated for each of 12 items of the WHODAS 2.0 using item response theory. The presence of DIF was assessed both numerically and graphically. When considering differences in both difficulty and discrimination, a statistically significant DIF was observed for all the items except for the item 'washing' (P values <0.001). The DIF was mostly uniform. Items 'standing', 'household responsibilities', 'learning a new task', 'emotional affectedness', 'concentrating', 'washing' and 'dressing' showed better precision among older patients. Items 'walking', 'dealing with strangers', 'maintaining a friendship' and 'day-to-day work' were more informative among younger patients. Difficulty and discrimination parameters were alike for all 12 items. The DIF was mostly uniform. These results can be taken into account when applying the WHODAS 2.0 to people with musculoskeletal complaints, especially when the studied groups are predominated by people of certain age.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.