Evaluation of post-tetanic motor evoked potential as an augmentation technique under partial neuromuscular blockade during craniotomy.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ayako Oi, Hironobu Hayashi, Keiko Uemura, Tomoshige Miyabayashi, Tsunenori Takatani, Ryosuke Matsuda, Ryuichi Abe, Ichiro Nakagawa, Masahiko Kawaguchi
{"title":"Evaluation of post-tetanic motor evoked potential as an augmentation technique under partial neuromuscular blockade during craniotomy.","authors":"Ayako Oi, Hironobu Hayashi, Keiko Uemura, Tomoshige Miyabayashi, Tsunenori Takatani, Ryosuke Matsuda, Ryuichi Abe, Ichiro Nakagawa, Masahiko Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In craniotomies requiring motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring, avoiding neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is preferable, but its complete avoidance poses risks of unexpected movement. This retrospective study investigates the application of a post-tetanic MEP augmentation technique to enhance baseline recording of transcranial stimulation MEP (Tc-MEP) under partial NMB during craniotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients were included. The level of partial NMB was maintained at a train-of-four ratio of approximately 40 %. Monophasic constant-current stimulation was applied on the craniotomy side with + 20 % of the threshold intensity. Post-tetanic Tc-MEP, involving tetanic stimulation of the median nerve 1 s before transcranial stimulation, was performed on patients who failed to record using conventional baseline recording.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-tetanic Tc-MEP technique successfully improved the success rate of baseline recording from 61.5 % to 100 %. Application of post-tetanic Tc-MEP significantly increased amplitudes in both the upper (p = 0.04) and lower limbs (p < 0.01) compared to before post-tetanic Tc-MEP. No patients had unexpected movements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that post-tetanic Tc-MEP enhanced the success rate of baseline recording during craniotomy under partial NMB.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The combination of partial NMB and post-tetanic Tc-MEP could be a useful regimen for craniotomy with MEP monitoring, addressing both safety concerns and successful baseline recording.</p>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"170 ","pages":"22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In craniotomies requiring motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring, avoiding neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is preferable, but its complete avoidance poses risks of unexpected movement. This retrospective study investigates the application of a post-tetanic MEP augmentation technique to enhance baseline recording of transcranial stimulation MEP (Tc-MEP) under partial NMB during craniotomy.

Methods: Twenty-six patients were included. The level of partial NMB was maintained at a train-of-four ratio of approximately 40 %. Monophasic constant-current stimulation was applied on the craniotomy side with + 20 % of the threshold intensity. Post-tetanic Tc-MEP, involving tetanic stimulation of the median nerve 1 s before transcranial stimulation, was performed on patients who failed to record using conventional baseline recording.

Results: The post-tetanic Tc-MEP technique successfully improved the success rate of baseline recording from 61.5 % to 100 %. Application of post-tetanic Tc-MEP significantly increased amplitudes in both the upper (p = 0.04) and lower limbs (p < 0.01) compared to before post-tetanic Tc-MEP. No patients had unexpected movements.

Conclusions: This study indicates that post-tetanic Tc-MEP enhanced the success rate of baseline recording during craniotomy under partial NMB.

Significance: The combination of partial NMB and post-tetanic Tc-MEP could be a useful regimen for craniotomy with MEP monitoring, addressing both safety concerns and successful baseline recording.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信