Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Naomi O. Riches, Tsegaselassie Workalemahu, Erin P. Johnson, Sarah Lopez, Nathan Blue, Jessica Page, Robert M. Silver, Erin Rothwell
{"title":"Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis","authors":"Naomi O. Riches,&nbsp;Tsegaselassie Workalemahu,&nbsp;Erin P. Johnson,&nbsp;Sarah Lopez,&nbsp;Nathan Blue,&nbsp;Jessica Page,&nbsp;Robert M. Silver,&nbsp;Erin Rothwell","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to explore individuals' beliefs, values, and experiences surrounding stillbirth evaluation decisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University of Utah Health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Parents who experienced a stillbirth in the past 5 years (<i>n</i> = 19) were interviewed about their experiences and decision to consent to or decline stillbirth evaluations, such as autopsy, placental histopathology, or genetic testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers and facilitators to parentsstillbirth postmortem decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants communicated several facilitators and barriers that contributed to their stillbirth evaluation decision. Reasons for consenting to evaluations were belief in science, background in medicine, altruism, to inform future pregnancies, thinking about preventing another stillbirth, and how patients viewed the care of their stillborn by the medical team. Reasons for declining evaluations were receiving a diagnosis prior to being offered a postmortem evaluation, intent to avoid causing further harm to the baby, interest to spend more time with their baby, and cost of the evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Stillbirth is one of the most difficult experiences of a parent. Diagnostic and emotional barriers create further challenges to decision-making for stillbirth postmortem evaluations. Parents often rely on inadequate information and personal values and beliefs during this time-sensitive decision process. Decision support for stillbirth evaluations and training for medical providers could benefit parents, may increase stillbirth evaluation uptake, and potentially prevent decisional regret.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Funding</h3>\n \n <p>Research reported in this publication was supported by the Utah Centre for Excellence in ELSI Research (UCEER).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 5","pages":"606-613"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.18038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore individuals' beliefs, values, and experiences surrounding stillbirth evaluation decisions.

Design

Qualitative research.

Setting

University of Utah Health.

Population

Parents who experienced a stillbirth in the past 5 years (n = 19) were interviewed about their experiences and decision to consent to or decline stillbirth evaluations, such as autopsy, placental histopathology, or genetic testing.

Methods

Qualitative content analysis.

Main Outcome Measures

Barriers and facilitators to parentsstillbirth postmortem decision-making.

Results

Participants communicated several facilitators and barriers that contributed to their stillbirth evaluation decision. Reasons for consenting to evaluations were belief in science, background in medicine, altruism, to inform future pregnancies, thinking about preventing another stillbirth, and how patients viewed the care of their stillborn by the medical team. Reasons for declining evaluations were receiving a diagnosis prior to being offered a postmortem evaluation, intent to avoid causing further harm to the baby, interest to spend more time with their baby, and cost of the evaluation.

Conclusion

Stillbirth is one of the most difficult experiences of a parent. Diagnostic and emotional barriers create further challenges to decision-making for stillbirth postmortem evaluations. Parents often rely on inadequate information and personal values and beliefs during this time-sensitive decision process. Decision support for stillbirth evaluations and training for medical providers could benefit parents, may increase stillbirth evaluation uptake, and potentially prevent decisional regret.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Utah Centre for Excellence in ELSI Research (UCEER).

促成死产评估的因素:定性分析
本研究的目的是探讨个人的信念,价值观,以及死胎评估决策的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信