Survey on the management of retinal arterial occlusions in Spain

N. Olivier-Pascual , J. Viéitez-Vázquez , A. García-Ben , R. Arroyo-Castillo , S. Rubio-Cid , N. Castro Casal , C. Quintero-González , J.M. Abalo-Lojo , M.D. Álvarez-Díaz
{"title":"Survey on the management of retinal arterial occlusions in Spain","authors":"N. Olivier-Pascual ,&nbsp;J. Viéitez-Vázquez ,&nbsp;A. García-Ben ,&nbsp;R. Arroyo-Castillo ,&nbsp;S. Rubio-Cid ,&nbsp;N. Castro Casal ,&nbsp;C. Quintero-González ,&nbsp;J.M. Abalo-Lojo ,&nbsp;M.D. Álvarez-Díaz","doi":"10.1016/j.oftale.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the current status of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) management in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>An anonymous questionnaire of 22 questions was carried out on the Google Forms® platform between April 27 and May 28, 2023. This questionnaire was distributed via email by the Spanish Society of Retina and Vitreous and the Spanish Society of Ophthalmology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>159 ophthalmologists from 91 public and 44 private centers in the 17 autonomous communities answered the questionnaire. Fifty-one percent of the ophthalmologists who answered the survey were women, 56.6% worked in public centers, 9.4% in private centers and 34% in both centers. Of the ophthalmologists working in public centers, 41.7% attend ophthalmologic emergencies 24 h a day, 365 days a year, while the rest delay their attention outside the usual hours. In 62.6% of the public centers with responses collected there are no protocols for the management of OAR in the ophthalmology services and as for multidisciplinary protocols, 57% recognize that they do not have one, 23% have one with neurology or internal medicine and only 13% of the centers include OAR within the stroke code. The most frequently reported treatments are hypotensors and anterior chamber paracentesis. In private centers, 73.7% report not having their own protocol, and 78.9% do not have a protocol with other services.</div><div>The main barriers perceived by the ophthalmologists surveyed were: patients arriving outside the window period (77.2%), no specific treatment and lack of established protocols (55.4%), low incidence (32.9%). Suggestions for improvement were: need to implement protocols, coordination with other services and that OAR be included as a stroke code.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite its limitations, (simple questionnaire, open design of some questions, lack of representation of centers and provinces and contradictory responses within the same center), we consider that it can serve as an approximation to the current management of RAO in Spain. It is necessary to develop protocols adapted to the different centers and to comply with them effectively in order to improve accessibility and equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93886,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia","volume":"100 1","pages":"Pages 16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173579424001816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the current status of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) management in Spain.

Material and Methods

An anonymous questionnaire of 22 questions was carried out on the Google Forms® platform between April 27 and May 28, 2023. This questionnaire was distributed via email by the Spanish Society of Retina and Vitreous and the Spanish Society of Ophthalmology.

Results

159 ophthalmologists from 91 public and 44 private centers in the 17 autonomous communities answered the questionnaire. Fifty-one percent of the ophthalmologists who answered the survey were women, 56.6% worked in public centers, 9.4% in private centers and 34% in both centers. Of the ophthalmologists working in public centers, 41.7% attend ophthalmologic emergencies 24 h a day, 365 days a year, while the rest delay their attention outside the usual hours. In 62.6% of the public centers with responses collected there are no protocols for the management of OAR in the ophthalmology services and as for multidisciplinary protocols, 57% recognize that they do not have one, 23% have one with neurology or internal medicine and only 13% of the centers include OAR within the stroke code. The most frequently reported treatments are hypotensors and anterior chamber paracentesis. In private centers, 73.7% report not having their own protocol, and 78.9% do not have a protocol with other services.
The main barriers perceived by the ophthalmologists surveyed were: patients arriving outside the window period (77.2%), no specific treatment and lack of established protocols (55.4%), low incidence (32.9%). Suggestions for improvement were: need to implement protocols, coordination with other services and that OAR be included as a stroke code.

Conclusions

Despite its limitations, (simple questionnaire, open design of some questions, lack of representation of centers and provinces and contradictory responses within the same center), we consider that it can serve as an approximation to the current management of RAO in Spain. It is necessary to develop protocols adapted to the different centers and to comply with them effectively in order to improve accessibility and equity.
西班牙视网膜动脉闭塞的治疗情况调查。
目的:了解西班牙视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO)的治疗现状。材料与方法:于2023年4月27日至5月28日在谷歌Forms®平台上进行了一份包含22个问题的匿名调查问卷。这份问卷由西班牙视网膜和玻璃体学会和西班牙眼科学会通过电子邮件分发。结果:来自17个自治区91个公立眼科中心和44个私立眼科中心的159名眼科医生参与了问卷调查。接受调查的眼科医生中有51%是女性,56.6%在公立中心工作,9.4%在私立中心工作,34%在两家中心都工作。在公立中心工作的眼科医生中,41.7%的人一年365天,每天24小时都参加眼科急诊,而其余的人则在正常时间以外推迟关注。在62.6%的公共中心中,没有针对眼科服务的OAR管理的协议,至于多学科协议,57%的中心承认他们没有协议,23%的中心有神经病学或内科协议,只有13%的中心将OAR纳入中风代码。最常见的治疗方法是降压和前房穿刺。在私人医疗中心,73.7%的人没有自己的协议,78.9%的人没有与其他服务的协议。受访眼科医生认为的主要障碍是:患者在窗口期以外到达(77.2%),无特异性治疗和缺乏既定方案(55.4%),发病率低(32.9%)。改进建议是:需要实施协议,与其他服务协调,以及将OAR作为笔划代码包括在内。结论:尽管有其局限性(问卷简单,部分问题设计开放,缺乏中心和省份的代表性,以及同一中心内部的相互矛盾的回答),但我们认为它可以作为西班牙RAO当前管理的近似方法。有必要制定适合不同中心的协议,并有效地遵守这些协议,以提高可及性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信