Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department.

Anales de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005
Iris Alonso Sánchez, Sandra Morán Moya, Gemma Claret Teruel, Roser Garrido Romero, David Muñoz Santanach, Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza, Carles Luaces Cubells
{"title":"Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department.","authors":"Iris Alonso Sánchez, Sandra Morán Moya, Gemma Claret Teruel, Roser Garrido Romero, David Muñoz Santanach, Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza, Carles Luaces Cubells","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>emergency department.</p><p><strong>Study period: </strong>4 years (May 2019-May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2-3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1-9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14-25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7-15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":"388-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.

Objective: To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.

Material and methods: Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency.

Setting: emergency department.

Study period: 4 years (May 2019-May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2-3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.

Results: A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1-9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14-25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7-15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.

Conclusions: The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信