Iris Alonso Sánchez, Sandra Morán Moya, Gemma Claret Teruel, Roser Garrido Romero, David Muñoz Santanach, Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza, Carles Luaces Cubells
{"title":"Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department.","authors":"Iris Alonso Sánchez, Sandra Morán Moya, Gemma Claret Teruel, Roser Garrido Romero, David Muñoz Santanach, Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza, Carles Luaces Cubells","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>emergency department.</p><p><strong>Study period: </strong>4 years (May 2019-May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2-3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1-9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14-25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7-15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":"388-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.
Objective: To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.
Material and methods: Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency.
Setting: emergency department.
Study period: 4 years (May 2019-May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2-3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.
Results: A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1-9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14-25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7-15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.
Conclusions: The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.