Early prediction of intensive care unit admission in emergency department patients using machine learning.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Dinesh Pandey, Hossein Jahanabadi, Jack D'Arcy, Suzanne Doherty, Hung Vo, Daryl Jones, Rinaldo Bellomo
{"title":"Early prediction of intensive care unit admission in emergency department patients using machine learning.","authors":"Dinesh Pandey, Hossein Jahanabadi, Jack D'Arcy, Suzanne Doherty, Hung Vo, Daryl Jones, Rinaldo Bellomo","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timely identification and transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department (ED) to the intensive care unit (ICU) is important for patient care and ED workflow practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop a predictive model for ICU admission early in the course of an ED presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted retrospective data from the electronic medical record and applied natural language processing and machine learning to information available early in the course of an ED presentation to develop a predictive model for ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 484 094 adult (≥18 years old) ED presentations, amongst which direct admission to the ICU occurred in 3955 (0.82%) instances. We trained machine learning in 323 678 ED presentations and performed testing/validation in 160 416 (70 546 for testing and 89 870 for validation). Although the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.92, the F1 score (0.177) and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.257) suggested substantial imbalance in the dataset. The strongest weighted variables in the predictive model at the 30-min timepoint were ED triage category, arrival via ambulance, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, baseline heart rate, and the number of inpatient presentations in the prior 12 months. Using a likelihood of ICU admission of more than 75%, for activation of automated ICU referral, we estimated the model would generate 2.7 triggers per day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The infrequency of ICU admissions as a proportion of ED presentations makes accurate early prediction of admissions challenging. Such triggers are likely to generate a moderate number of false positives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The timely identification and transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department (ED) to the intensive care unit (ICU) is important for patient care and ED workflow practices.

Objective: We aimed to develop a predictive model for ICU admission early in the course of an ED presentation.

Methods: We extracted retrospective data from the electronic medical record and applied natural language processing and machine learning to information available early in the course of an ED presentation to develop a predictive model for ICU admission.

Results: We studied 484 094 adult (≥18 years old) ED presentations, amongst which direct admission to the ICU occurred in 3955 (0.82%) instances. We trained machine learning in 323 678 ED presentations and performed testing/validation in 160 416 (70 546 for testing and 89 870 for validation). Although the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.92, the F1 score (0.177) and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.257) suggested substantial imbalance in the dataset. The strongest weighted variables in the predictive model at the 30-min timepoint were ED triage category, arrival via ambulance, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, baseline heart rate, and the number of inpatient presentations in the prior 12 months. Using a likelihood of ICU admission of more than 75%, for activation of automated ICU referral, we estimated the model would generate 2.7 triggers per day.

Conclusions: The infrequency of ICU admissions as a proportion of ED presentations makes accurate early prediction of admissions challenging. Such triggers are likely to generate a moderate number of false positives.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信