Exploring the association of social isolation and loneliness on the experience of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization in the Japanese population: the JACSIS study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hiroshi Murayama, Takumi Suda, Isuzu Nakamoto, Takahiro Tabuchi
{"title":"Exploring the association of social isolation and loneliness on the experience of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization in the Japanese population: the JACSIS study.","authors":"Hiroshi Murayama, Takumi Suda, Isuzu Nakamoto, Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1007/s00127-024-02793-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness have been long-standing public health concerns, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exacerbated these issues. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the associations of social isolation and loneliness during the pandemic with experience of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization in the Japanese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were sourced from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS), a large-scale, web-based national survey of individuals aged 15-79. This study used JACSIS data from 2020 to 2022, representing the first and third years of the pandemic. Social isolation was measured by the frequency of direct and indirect contact with people other than co-residing family members. Loneliness was evaluated using the UCLA Loneliness Scale, while COVID-19 infection and hospitalization were self-reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,612 individuals were included, of whom 1.5% had experienced hospital admission due to COVID-19, and 9.3% were infected but not hospitalized. Social isolation was inversely associated with COVID-19 infection risk (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.90), while a higher level of loneliness was related to hospitalization (odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.59-3.09). Sex-stratified analyses revealed stronger associations in men than women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the complex relationship between psychosocial factors and infectious disease outcomes, underscoring the need for comprehensive approaches to address the multifaceted challenges posed by global health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02793-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Social isolation and loneliness have been long-standing public health concerns, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exacerbated these issues. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the associations of social isolation and loneliness during the pandemic with experience of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization in the Japanese population.

Methods: Data were sourced from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS), a large-scale, web-based national survey of individuals aged 15-79. This study used JACSIS data from 2020 to 2022, representing the first and third years of the pandemic. Social isolation was measured by the frequency of direct and indirect contact with people other than co-residing family members. Loneliness was evaluated using the UCLA Loneliness Scale, while COVID-19 infection and hospitalization were self-reported.

Results: A total of 13,612 individuals were included, of whom 1.5% had experienced hospital admission due to COVID-19, and 9.3% were infected but not hospitalized. Social isolation was inversely associated with COVID-19 infection risk (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.90), while a higher level of loneliness was related to hospitalization (odds ratio = 2.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.59-3.09). Sex-stratified analyses revealed stronger associations in men than women.

Conclusion: This study highlights the complex relationship between psychosocial factors and infectious disease outcomes, underscoring the need for comprehensive approaches to address the multifaceted challenges posed by global health crises.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信