{"title":"Caffeic acid differentially modulates behavior and neurochemicals in chronic unpredictable mild stress and dexamethasone induced models of depression.","authors":"Hariom, Prerna Kumari, Sushma Chaturvedi, Sonika Shrivastav, Sushma Maratha, Vaibhav Walia","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study authors studied the effect of caffeic acid (CA) in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and dexamethasone (DEXA) model of depression. CUMS (21 days) and DEXA (1.5 mg/kg × 21 days) was used for the induction of depression and anxiety related behavior. Locomotor activity was determined using actophotometer. Depression related behavior was determined using tail suspension test (TST) and forced swim test (FST) whereas for the determination of anxiety related behavior elevated plus maze (EPM) test was used. Following behavioral studies, mice were sacrificed by decapitation method. Hippocampus was dissected and was used for the neurochemical assays including 5-HT (serotonin), glutamate, nitrite and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The results obtained suggested that the CA (25-100 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the activity count in CUMS exposed and DEXA treated mice. CA (50 mg/kg) evoked anxiogenic reactions in CUMS model by increasing the hippocampal nitrite and glutamate level while CA (50 mg/kg) exerted anxiolysis in DEXA model by reducing the level of 5-HT. In CUMS model, CA exerted antidepressant like effect by increasing the hippocampal nitric oxide (NO) level, in DEXA model CA exerted antidepressant like effect by reducing the hippocampal glutamate level. CA failed to reverse DEXA mediated nNOS inhibition and therefore decreases hippocampal glutamate level to exert antidepressant like effect. Thus, CA modulate anxiety and depression related neurobehavioral alterations in both CUMS and DEXA models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"173930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173930","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present study authors studied the effect of caffeic acid (CA) in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and dexamethasone (DEXA) model of depression. CUMS (21 days) and DEXA (1.5 mg/kg × 21 days) was used for the induction of depression and anxiety related behavior. Locomotor activity was determined using actophotometer. Depression related behavior was determined using tail suspension test (TST) and forced swim test (FST) whereas for the determination of anxiety related behavior elevated plus maze (EPM) test was used. Following behavioral studies, mice were sacrificed by decapitation method. Hippocampus was dissected and was used for the neurochemical assays including 5-HT (serotonin), glutamate, nitrite and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The results obtained suggested that the CA (25-100 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the activity count in CUMS exposed and DEXA treated mice. CA (50 mg/kg) evoked anxiogenic reactions in CUMS model by increasing the hippocampal nitrite and glutamate level while CA (50 mg/kg) exerted anxiolysis in DEXA model by reducing the level of 5-HT. In CUMS model, CA exerted antidepressant like effect by increasing the hippocampal nitric oxide (NO) level, in DEXA model CA exerted antidepressant like effect by reducing the hippocampal glutamate level. CA failed to reverse DEXA mediated nNOS inhibition and therefore decreases hippocampal glutamate level to exert antidepressant like effect. Thus, CA modulate anxiety and depression related neurobehavioral alterations in both CUMS and DEXA models.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.