Repeated pancreatic juice cytology via endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage catheter combined with clinical findings improves diagnostic ability for malignant cases of suspected pancreatic cancer with non-identifiable tumors
{"title":"Repeated pancreatic juice cytology via endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage catheter combined with clinical findings improves diagnostic ability for malignant cases of suspected pancreatic cancer with non-identifiable tumors","authors":"Tatsunori Satoh , Junichi Kaneko , Eiji Nakatani , Hirotoshi Ishiwatari , Junya Sato , Akihiko Ohata , Reiko Yamada , Tetsuro Miwata , Kazuma Ishikawa , Fumitaka Niiya , Yosuke Kobayashi , Yasushi Hamaya , Jun Ito , Kazuhito Kawata , Azumi Suzuki , Yasunari Sakamoto , Yuya Ishiguro , Haruna Takahashi , Shinya Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>The detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) often depends on indirect indicators such as parenchyma atrophy (PPA), main pancreatic duct stenosis, and low echoic areas, particularly when no mass is evident on imaging. While pathological evaluation is the gold standard for differentiating malignant from benign conditions, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy is not always feasible in such cases. Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) via endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (NPD) has emerged as an alternative diagnostic method, though its accuracy remains underevaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SPACE and explore strategies to enhance its accuracy in diagnosing PC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent SPACE between January 2015 and September 2023. The inclusion criteria focused on cases lacking a clear pancreatic mass but exhibiting indirect signs suggestive of PC. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using surgical pathology or a minimum follow-up period of 12 months as the reference standard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 164 patients, 85 (51.8 %) were diagnosed with malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity of SPACE were 74.1 % and 87.3 %, respectively, with a area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.807 (95%CI: 0.748–0.867). Incorporating patient age, CEA and PPA with SPACE results further improved diagnostic performance, yielding a ROC-AUC of 0.828 (95%CI: 0.76–0.897, p = 0.013).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Combining SPACE with clinical and imaging findings significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in suspected PC cases where conventional imaging fails to detect tumors. This integrated approach has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes by facilitating more accurate patient management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 125-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S142439032400807X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives
The detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) often depends on indirect indicators such as parenchyma atrophy (PPA), main pancreatic duct stenosis, and low echoic areas, particularly when no mass is evident on imaging. While pathological evaluation is the gold standard for differentiating malignant from benign conditions, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy is not always feasible in such cases. Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) via endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage (NPD) has emerged as an alternative diagnostic method, though its accuracy remains underevaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SPACE and explore strategies to enhance its accuracy in diagnosing PC.
Methods
This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent SPACE between January 2015 and September 2023. The inclusion criteria focused on cases lacking a clear pancreatic mass but exhibiting indirect signs suggestive of PC. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using surgical pathology or a minimum follow-up period of 12 months as the reference standard.
Results
Among 164 patients, 85 (51.8 %) were diagnosed with malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity of SPACE were 74.1 % and 87.3 %, respectively, with a area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.807 (95%CI: 0.748–0.867). Incorporating patient age, CEA and PPA with SPACE results further improved diagnostic performance, yielding a ROC-AUC of 0.828 (95%CI: 0.76–0.897, p = 0.013).
Conclusions
Combining SPACE with clinical and imaging findings significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in suspected PC cases where conventional imaging fails to detect tumors. This integrated approach has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes by facilitating more accurate patient management.
期刊介绍:
Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.