Use of CPR feedback devices to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany: Associated with improved ROSC-rates, but infrequent usage, in a registry-based analysis of 107,548 cases.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Andreas Friedrich Christoph Breuer-Kaiser, Rolf Lefering, Thomas Peter Weber, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Jan Wnent
{"title":"Use of CPR feedback devices to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany: Associated with improved ROSC-rates, but infrequent usage, in a registry-based analysis of 107,548 cases.","authors":"Andreas Friedrich Christoph Breuer-Kaiser, Rolf Lefering, Thomas Peter Weber, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Jan Wnent","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in Europe. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, particularly of chest compressions, is crucial. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices aim to enhance chest compression quality. Recent studies on these tools have reported improved outcomes for in-hospital but not for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This registry-based, retrospective study investigated the use of feedback-devices by emergency medical services personnel to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany and assessed its effect on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 107,548 records from the German Resuscitation Registry between 2015 and 2022 and compared patient outcomes of patients treated with feedback devices or not. ROSC rates both at any time and at hospital admission were compared to expected rates based on the \"Rosc After Cardiac Arrest\" (RACA) score. Furthermore, a generalized linear mixed methods model was calculated to receive an adjusted effect for those devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feedback-devices were used in 17.5% of cases overall, rising from 7.1% (2015) to 23.2% (2022). Patients resuscitated with feedback devices had a 2.6% higher rate of hospital admission with spontaneous circulation (35.9% vs. 33.3%). In both groups, the ROSC rates were higher than predicted by the RACA score. After multivariable adjustment we found a minor effect for RTAVF use on any ROSC (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14), but no effect on the ROSC rate on admission (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could show a minor association between the use of feedback devices and any ROSC, but not for ROSC on hospital admission, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a generalized linear mixed model. Further research should address implementation strategies, sustainability and evaluate its effectiveness for other applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110453"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in Europe. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, particularly of chest compressions, is crucial. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices aim to enhance chest compression quality. Recent studies on these tools have reported improved outcomes for in-hospital but not for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This registry-based, retrospective study investigated the use of feedback-devices by emergency medical services personnel to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany and assessed its effect on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Methods: We analyzed 107,548 records from the German Resuscitation Registry between 2015 and 2022 and compared patient outcomes of patients treated with feedback devices or not. ROSC rates both at any time and at hospital admission were compared to expected rates based on the "Rosc After Cardiac Arrest" (RACA) score. Furthermore, a generalized linear mixed methods model was calculated to receive an adjusted effect for those devices.

Results: Feedback-devices were used in 17.5% of cases overall, rising from 7.1% (2015) to 23.2% (2022). Patients resuscitated with feedback devices had a 2.6% higher rate of hospital admission with spontaneous circulation (35.9% vs. 33.3%). In both groups, the ROSC rates were higher than predicted by the RACA score. After multivariable adjustment we found a minor effect for RTAVF use on any ROSC (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14), but no effect on the ROSC rate on admission (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.03).

Conclusion: We could show a minor association between the use of feedback devices and any ROSC, but not for ROSC on hospital admission, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a generalized linear mixed model. Further research should address implementation strategies, sustainability and evaluate its effectiveness for other applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信