Gender differences in the response to antipsychotics or mood stabilizers in patients with acute mania: An individual patient data meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Bram W C Storosum, Sem E Cohen, Taina K Mattila, Kit C B Roes, Carlijn Welten, Wim van den Brink, Lieuwe de Haan, Damiaan Denys, Jasper B Zantvoord
{"title":"Gender differences in the response to antipsychotics or mood stabilizers in patients with acute mania: An individual patient data meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies.","authors":"Bram W C Storosum, Sem E Cohen, Taina K Mattila, Kit C B Roes, Carlijn Welten, Wim van den Brink, Lieuwe de Haan, Damiaan Denys, Jasper B Zantvoord","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence suggests a worse clinical course in women compared to men with bipolar disorder. However, little research has explored gender differences in the efficacy of anti-manic medication. We sought to determine whether there are gender differences in efficacy of drug treatment in acute manic episodes of bipolar I disorder, and the influence of dichotomized age as a proxy for menopausal status and baseline severity on gender differences. We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of 10 short term placebo controlled registration trials for treatment of acute mania (N = 2199) performed between 1996 and 2007 using the (Young) Mania Rating Scale ((Y)MRS)) as outcome. We observed a difference in effect size in mean change and responder status between men and women (NNT = 6.3 vs. 5.3), with a small but significant effect of gender on treatment response (β = 0.031). The effect size was larger in women older than 47 compared to women aged 47 and under (NNT = 4.2 vs. 7.5), and to a lesser extent, larger in men over 47 years compared those aged 47 and under (NNT = 3.8 vs. 6). Results were mainly driven by differences in response in the placebo group and independent of baseline severity. These findings suggest that men and premenopausal women might have a clinically modest advantage over their women and postmenopausal counterparts in treatment with anti-manic medication. Our results were limited by our sample not including antimanic agents registered after 2007 and by the absence of direct biological information regarding sex and menopausal state. Future research should aim to replicate current findings utilizing biological confirmation on the menopausal status and test whether findings are generalizable to newer antimanic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests a worse clinical course in women compared to men with bipolar disorder. However, little research has explored gender differences in the efficacy of anti-manic medication. We sought to determine whether there are gender differences in efficacy of drug treatment in acute manic episodes of bipolar I disorder, and the influence of dichotomized age as a proxy for menopausal status and baseline severity on gender differences. We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of 10 short term placebo controlled registration trials for treatment of acute mania (N = 2199) performed between 1996 and 2007 using the (Young) Mania Rating Scale ((Y)MRS)) as outcome. We observed a difference in effect size in mean change and responder status between men and women (NNT = 6.3 vs. 5.3), with a small but significant effect of gender on treatment response (β = 0.031). The effect size was larger in women older than 47 compared to women aged 47 and under (NNT = 4.2 vs. 7.5), and to a lesser extent, larger in men over 47 years compared those aged 47 and under (NNT = 3.8 vs. 6). Results were mainly driven by differences in response in the placebo group and independent of baseline severity. These findings suggest that men and premenopausal women might have a clinically modest advantage over their women and postmenopausal counterparts in treatment with anti-manic medication. Our results were limited by our sample not including antimanic agents registered after 2007 and by the absence of direct biological information regarding sex and menopausal state. Future research should aim to replicate current findings utilizing biological confirmation on the menopausal status and test whether findings are generalizable to newer antimanic agents.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信