A prognostic and predictive model based on deep learning to identify optimal candidates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jiong-Lin Liang, Yue-Feng Wen, Ying-Ping Huang, Jia Guo, Yun He, Hong-Wei Xing, Ling Guo, Hai-Qiang Mai, Qi Yang
{"title":"A prognostic and predictive model based on deep learning to identify optimal candidates for intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.","authors":"Jiong-Lin Liang, Yue-Feng Wen, Ying-Ping Huang, Jia Guo, Yun He, Hong-Wei Xing, Ling Guo, Hai-Qiang Mai, Qi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a prognostic and predictive model integrating deep learning MRI features and clinical information in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to identify patients with a low risk of progression for whom intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone is sufficient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective study enrolled 999 patients with stage II NPC from two centers. 3DResNet was used to extract deep learning MRI features and eXtreme Gradient Boosting model was employed to integrate the pre-trained features and clinical information to obtain an overall score for each patient. Based on the optimal cutoff value of the overall score, patients were stratified into high- and low- risk groups. Model performance was evaluated using concordance indexes (C-indexes), the area under the curve (AUC) values and calibration tests. Survival curves were used to analyze the clinical benefits of additional chemotherapy in each risk group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined model achieved a concordance index of 0.789 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.787-0.791), 0.768 (95 % CI 0.764-0.771), and 0.804 (95 % CI 0.801-0.807) for the training, internal validation, and external test cohorts, respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement compared to the MRI model, T Stage, and N Stage. An overall score of < 0.405 in patients was significantly associated with a low risk of progression. In the low-risk group, patients treated with IMRT alone had comparable or even superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those who received additional chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model demonstrated a satisfactory prognostic and predictive performance for PFS. Patients with stage II NPC were stratified into different risk groups to help identify optimal candidates who could benefit from IMRT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"110660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a prognostic and predictive model integrating deep learning MRI features and clinical information in patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to identify patients with a low risk of progression for whom intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone is sufficient.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study enrolled 999 patients with stage II NPC from two centers. 3DResNet was used to extract deep learning MRI features and eXtreme Gradient Boosting model was employed to integrate the pre-trained features and clinical information to obtain an overall score for each patient. Based on the optimal cutoff value of the overall score, patients were stratified into high- and low- risk groups. Model performance was evaluated using concordance indexes (C-indexes), the area under the curve (AUC) values and calibration tests. Survival curves were used to analyze the clinical benefits of additional chemotherapy in each risk group.

Results: The combined model achieved a concordance index of 0.789 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.787-0.791), 0.768 (95 % CI 0.764-0.771), and 0.804 (95 % CI 0.801-0.807) for the training, internal validation, and external test cohorts, respectively, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement compared to the MRI model, T Stage, and N Stage. An overall score of < 0.405 in patients was significantly associated with a low risk of progression. In the low-risk group, patients treated with IMRT alone had comparable or even superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those who received additional chemotherapy.

Conclusion: The model demonstrated a satisfactory prognostic and predictive performance for PFS. Patients with stage II NPC were stratified into different risk groups to help identify optimal candidates who could benefit from IMRT alone.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信