Jun Kawashima, Abdullah Altaf, Yutaka Endo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Zayed Rashid, Alfredo Guglielmi, Hugo P Marques, Shishir K Maithel, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Carlo Pulitano, Federico Aucejo, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Lymphadenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: therapeutic benefit of lymph node number and station.","authors":"Jun Kawashima, Abdullah Altaf, Yutaka Endo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Zayed Rashid, Alfredo Guglielmi, Hugo P Marques, Shishir K Maithel, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Carlo Pulitano, Federico Aucejo, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to characterize the benefit of lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) utilizing the therapeutic index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pCCA were obtained from 8 high-volume international hepatobiliary centers. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess clinicopathological factors associated with overall survival (OS). The therapeutic index was determined to assess the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 341 patients, median number of lymph nodes (LNs) evaluated was 7 (IQR: 4-11). A total of 127 (37.2 %) patients underwent lymphadenectomy of station 12 only, while 146 (42.8 %) patients had LNs from stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 harvested. On multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy of stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 was associated with improved OS (referent, station 12 only: HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.32-0.80). The therapeutic index was highest among patients who underwent LN evaluation of stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 (33.1) and had ≥6 LNs harvested (26.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the time of surgery of pCCA, lymphadenectomy should include station 12, as well as stations 8 and 13, with the goal to evaluate ≥6 LNs to ensure optimal staging and maximize the therapeutic benefit for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We sought to characterize the benefit of lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) utilizing the therapeutic index.
Methods: Data on patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pCCA were obtained from 8 high-volume international hepatobiliary centers. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess clinicopathological factors associated with overall survival (OS). The therapeutic index was determined to assess the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy.
Results: Among 341 patients, median number of lymph nodes (LNs) evaluated was 7 (IQR: 4-11). A total of 127 (37.2 %) patients underwent lymphadenectomy of station 12 only, while 146 (42.8 %) patients had LNs from stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 harvested. On multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy of stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 was associated with improved OS (referent, station 12 only: HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.32-0.80). The therapeutic index was highest among patients who underwent LN evaluation of stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 (33.1) and had ≥6 LNs harvested (26.3).
Conclusion: At the time of surgery of pCCA, lymphadenectomy should include station 12, as well as stations 8 and 13, with the goal to evaluate ≥6 LNs to ensure optimal staging and maximize the therapeutic benefit for patients.
期刊介绍:
HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication.
Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice.
Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice.
HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields.
Abstracted and Indexed in:
MEDLINE®
EMBASE
PubMed
Science Citation Index Expanded
Academic Search (EBSCO)
HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).