{"title":"Spontaneous regression in mature T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.","authors":"Akihiro Ohmoto, Shigeo Fuji","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2024.2439469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spontaneous regression (SR) is observed in some patients with mature T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (MTCL), including adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), although the incidence is rare.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>We extracted 31 cases with MTCL who experienced SR based on a literature search and summarized the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>MTCL with SR included various subtypes, the most common being ATL (<i>n</i> = 17). Five of 24 cases (21%) maintained SR for more than 5 years, and the median duration of SR was 2 years. Sixteen of 31 cases (52%) experienced tumor relapse after SR. Two retrospective studies including ATL cases showed SR rates of 18% and 4%, respectively. Representative triggers are infection and surgical biopsies, and possible mechanisms include immunological mechanisms such as cross-reactivity of virus-specific T cells with tumor antigens. The diagnostic criteria for SR are not standardized among reports, and the clinical outcomes are not fully described. Practically, observation is the only accepted strategy after SR was achieved. In the era of molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy, new strategies including maintenance therapy after SR could be discussed, although clinical data are lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2024.2439469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Spontaneous regression (SR) is observed in some patients with mature T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (MTCL), including adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), although the incidence is rare.
Area covered: We extracted 31 cases with MTCL who experienced SR based on a literature search and summarized the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.
Expert opinion: MTCL with SR included various subtypes, the most common being ATL (n = 17). Five of 24 cases (21%) maintained SR for more than 5 years, and the median duration of SR was 2 years. Sixteen of 31 cases (52%) experienced tumor relapse after SR. Two retrospective studies including ATL cases showed SR rates of 18% and 4%, respectively. Representative triggers are infection and surgical biopsies, and possible mechanisms include immunological mechanisms such as cross-reactivity of virus-specific T cells with tumor antigens. The diagnostic criteria for SR are not standardized among reports, and the clinical outcomes are not fully described. Practically, observation is the only accepted strategy after SR was achieved. In the era of molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy, new strategies including maintenance therapy after SR could be discussed, although clinical data are lacking.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.