Changing the Inoculum Type From Preculture to Spore Suspension Markedly Alters the Production of Secondary Metabolites in Filamentous Microbial Coculture.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Tomasz Boruta, Weronika Pawlikowska, Martyna Foryś, Grzegorz Englart, Anna Ścigaczewska
{"title":"Changing the Inoculum Type From Preculture to Spore Suspension Markedly Alters the Production of Secondary Metabolites in Filamentous Microbial Coculture.","authors":"Tomasz Boruta, Weronika Pawlikowska, Martyna Foryś, Grzegorz Englart, Anna Ścigaczewska","doi":"10.1007/s00284-024-04007-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shake flask cocultures of Aspergillus terreus and Streptomyces rimosus were investigated with regard to the production of mevinolinic acid (lovastatin), oxytetracycline, and other secondary metabolites (SMs). The aim of the study was to determine the effect of inoculum type (spore suspension or preculture) on the levels of SMs in the fermentation broth. Altogether, 17 SMs were detected, including 4 products with confirmed identities, 10 putatively annotated metabolites, and 3 unknown molecules. As observed over the course of qualitative and quantitative analyses, the selection of inoculum type markedly influenced the SM-related outcomes of cocultures. Depending on the coculture initiation procedure, replacing the preculture with spore inoculum positively affected the biosynthesis of oxytetracycline, butyrolactone I, (+)-geodin, as well as the molecules putatively identified as rimocidin, CE-108, and (+)-erdin. It was concluded that the comparative analyses of SM production in filamentous microbial cocultures and monocultures are dependent on the type of inoculum and thus the diversification of inocula is highly recommended in such studies. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that designing a coculture experiment that involves only a single type of inoculum may lead to the underestimation of biosynthetic repertoires of filamentous microorganisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11360,"journal":{"name":"Current Microbiology","volume":"82 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-04007-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shake flask cocultures of Aspergillus terreus and Streptomyces rimosus were investigated with regard to the production of mevinolinic acid (lovastatin), oxytetracycline, and other secondary metabolites (SMs). The aim of the study was to determine the effect of inoculum type (spore suspension or preculture) on the levels of SMs in the fermentation broth. Altogether, 17 SMs were detected, including 4 products with confirmed identities, 10 putatively annotated metabolites, and 3 unknown molecules. As observed over the course of qualitative and quantitative analyses, the selection of inoculum type markedly influenced the SM-related outcomes of cocultures. Depending on the coculture initiation procedure, replacing the preculture with spore inoculum positively affected the biosynthesis of oxytetracycline, butyrolactone I, (+)-geodin, as well as the molecules putatively identified as rimocidin, CE-108, and (+)-erdin. It was concluded that the comparative analyses of SM production in filamentous microbial cocultures and monocultures are dependent on the type of inoculum and thus the diversification of inocula is highly recommended in such studies. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that designing a coculture experiment that involves only a single type of inoculum may lead to the underestimation of biosynthetic repertoires of filamentous microorganisms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Microbiology
Current Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Current Microbiology is a well-established journal that publishes articles in all aspects of microbial cells and the interactions between the microorganisms, their hosts and the environment. Current Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor, spanning the following areas: physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, biotechnology, ecology, evolution, morphology, taxonomy, diagnostic methods, medical and clinical microbiology and immunology as applied to microorganisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信