Prefrontal tDCS fails to modulate memory retrieval in younger and older adults.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Current Biology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.080
Tesnim Arar, Gabriella V Hirsch, Taylor A Chamberlain, Miranda Malone, Cheyenne D Wakeland-Hart, Martynas Snarskis, Diane S Lauderdale, L Philip Schumm, David A Gallo
{"title":"Prefrontal tDCS fails to modulate memory retrieval in younger and older adults.","authors":"Tesnim Arar, Gabriella V Hirsch, Taylor A Chamberlain, Miranda Malone, Cheyenne D Wakeland-Hart, Martynas Snarskis, Diane S Lauderdale, L Philip Schumm, David A Gallo","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research shows that a single session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) can improve the accuracy of episodic memory retrieval, but stimulation effects are not always found and may be moderated by time of day. Here, we report the results from a rigorous clinical trial (NCT03723850) designed to replicate these tDCS findings in younger adults and extend them to cognitively normal older adults. We conducted the largest double-blind, between-subjects tDCS study on memory retrieval in younger and older adults to date. 150 younger adults and 91 older adults received anodal tDCS or sham stimulation to the left dlPFC prior to episodic memory retrieval and working memory tasks. We also manipulated when tDCS was administered (time of day: morning vs. afternoon), task difficulty (easy vs. hard), and stimulus format (verbal vs. visual/pictorial) to test the extent that these variables are important for identifying tDCS effects. Contrary to our preregistered predictions, we did not find any effect of tDCS or time of day on younger or older adults' episodic or working memory performance. This outcome was not due to insensitivity of our cognitive tasks, given that we found expected effects of task difficulty and age-related effects on our memory measures. Based on these and prior tDCS results, we conclude that a single dose of tDCS using the typical and often recommended parameters does not reliably improve episodic memory retrieval in either age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11359,"journal":{"name":"Current Biology","volume":" ","pages":"50-58.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research shows that a single session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) can improve the accuracy of episodic memory retrieval, but stimulation effects are not always found and may be moderated by time of day. Here, we report the results from a rigorous clinical trial (NCT03723850) designed to replicate these tDCS findings in younger adults and extend them to cognitively normal older adults. We conducted the largest double-blind, between-subjects tDCS study on memory retrieval in younger and older adults to date. 150 younger adults and 91 older adults received anodal tDCS or sham stimulation to the left dlPFC prior to episodic memory retrieval and working memory tasks. We also manipulated when tDCS was administered (time of day: morning vs. afternoon), task difficulty (easy vs. hard), and stimulus format (verbal vs. visual/pictorial) to test the extent that these variables are important for identifying tDCS effects. Contrary to our preregistered predictions, we did not find any effect of tDCS or time of day on younger or older adults' episodic or working memory performance. This outcome was not due to insensitivity of our cognitive tasks, given that we found expected effects of task difficulty and age-related effects on our memory measures. Based on these and prior tDCS results, we conclude that a single dose of tDCS using the typical and often recommended parameters does not reliably improve episodic memory retrieval in either age group.

在年轻人和老年人中,前额叶tDCS无法调节记忆提取。
以往的研究表明,单次对左背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)的经颅阳极直流电刺激(tDCS)可以提高情景记忆检索的准确性,但刺激效果并不总是被发现,并且可能随着一天中的时间而减慢。在这里,我们报告了一项严格的临床试验(NCT03723850)的结果,该试验旨在在年轻人中复制这些tDCS发现,并将其扩展到认知正常的老年人。我们对年轻人和老年人进行了迄今为止最大的双盲、受试者之间的tDCS记忆检索研究。150名年轻人和91名老年人在情景记忆检索和工作记忆任务之前接受了对左dlPFC的阳极tDCS或假刺激。我们还操纵了tDCS的实施时间(上午与下午)、任务难度(简单与困难)和刺激形式(口头与视觉/图像),以测试这些变量对识别tDCS效果的重要程度。与我们预先登记的预测相反,我们没有发现tDCS或一天中的时间对年轻人或老年人的情景或工作记忆表现有任何影响。这个结果不是由于我们的认知任务不敏感,因为我们发现任务难度和年龄相关的影响对我们的记忆测量有预期的影响。基于这些和先前的tDCS结果,我们得出结论,使用典型和经常推荐的参数的单剂量tDCS并不能可靠地改善两个年龄组的情景记忆检索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Biology
Current Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
869
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Biology is a comprehensive journal that showcases original research in various disciplines of biology. It provides a platform for scientists to disseminate their groundbreaking findings and promotes interdisciplinary communication. The journal publishes articles of general interest, encompassing diverse fields of biology. Moreover, it offers accessible editorial pieces that are specifically designed to enlighten non-specialist readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信