Phylogenomics of neglected flagellated protists supports a revised eukaryotic tree of life.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Guifré Torruella, Luis Javier Galindo, David Moreira, Purificación López-García
{"title":"Phylogenomics of neglected flagellated protists supports a revised eukaryotic tree of life.","authors":"Guifré Torruella, Luis Javier Galindo, David Moreira, Purificación López-García","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eukaryotes evolved from prokaryotic predecessors in the early Proterozoic<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup> and radiated from their already complex last common ancestor,<sup>3</sup> diversifying into several supergroups with unresolved deep evolutionary connections.<sup>4</sup> They evolved extremely diverse lifestyles, playing crucial roles in the carbon cycle.<sup>5</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>6</sup> Heterotrophic flagellates are arguably the most diverse eukaryotes<sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>7</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>8</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>9</sup> and often occupy basal positions in phylogenetic trees. However, many of them remain undersampled<sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>10</sup> and/or incertae sedis.<sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>11</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>12</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>13</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>14</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>15</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>16</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>17</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>18</sup> Progressive improvement of phylogenomic methods and a wider protist sampling have reshaped and consolidated major clades in the eukaryotic tree.<sup>13</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>14</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>15</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>16</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>17</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>18</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>19</sup> This is illustrated by the Opimoda,<sup>14</sup> one of the largest eukaryotic supergroups (Amoebozoa, Ancyromonadida, Apusomonadida, Breviatea, CRuMs [Collodictyon-Rigifila-Mantamonas], Malawimonadida, and Opisthokonta-including animals and fungi).<sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>14</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>19</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>20</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>21</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>22</sup> However, their deepest evolutionary relationships still remain uncertain. Here, we sequenced transcriptomes of poorly studied flagellates<sup>23</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>24</sup> (14 apusomonads,<sup>25</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>26</sup> 7 ancyromonads,<sup>27</sup> and 1 cultured Mediterranean strain of Meteora sporadica<sup>17</sup>) and conducted comprehensive phylogenomics analyses with an expanded taxon sampling of early-branching protists. Our findings support the monophyly of Opimoda, with CRuMs being sister to the Amorphea (amoebozoans, breviates, apusomonads, and opisthokonts) and ancyromonads and malawimonads forming a moderately supported clade. By mapping key complex phenotypic traits onto this phylogenetic framework, we infer an opimodan biflagellate ancestor with an excavate-like feeding groove, which ancyromonads subsequently lost. Although breviates and apusomonads retained the ancestral biflagellate state, some early-diverging Amorphea lost one or both flagella, facilitating the evolution of amoeboid morphologies, novel feeding modes, and palintomic cell division resulting in multinucleated cells. These innovations likely facilitated the subsequent evolution of fungal and metazoan multicellularity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11359,"journal":{"name":"Current Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eukaryotes evolved from prokaryotic predecessors in the early Proterozoic1,2 and radiated from their already complex last common ancestor,3 diversifying into several supergroups with unresolved deep evolutionary connections.4 They evolved extremely diverse lifestyles, playing crucial roles in the carbon cycle.5,6 Heterotrophic flagellates are arguably the most diverse eukaryotes4,7,8,9 and often occupy basal positions in phylogenetic trees. However, many of them remain undersampled4,10 and/or incertae sedis.4,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 Progressive improvement of phylogenomic methods and a wider protist sampling have reshaped and consolidated major clades in the eukaryotic tree.13,14,15,16,17,18,19 This is illustrated by the Opimoda,14 one of the largest eukaryotic supergroups (Amoebozoa, Ancyromonadida, Apusomonadida, Breviatea, CRuMs [Collodictyon-Rigifila-Mantamonas], Malawimonadida, and Opisthokonta-including animals and fungi).4,14,19,20,21,22 However, their deepest evolutionary relationships still remain uncertain. Here, we sequenced transcriptomes of poorly studied flagellates23,24 (14 apusomonads,25,26 7 ancyromonads,27 and 1 cultured Mediterranean strain of Meteora sporadica17) and conducted comprehensive phylogenomics analyses with an expanded taxon sampling of early-branching protists. Our findings support the monophyly of Opimoda, with CRuMs being sister to the Amorphea (amoebozoans, breviates, apusomonads, and opisthokonts) and ancyromonads and malawimonads forming a moderately supported clade. By mapping key complex phenotypic traits onto this phylogenetic framework, we infer an opimodan biflagellate ancestor with an excavate-like feeding groove, which ancyromonads subsequently lost. Although breviates and apusomonads retained the ancestral biflagellate state, some early-diverging Amorphea lost one or both flagella, facilitating the evolution of amoeboid morphologies, novel feeding modes, and palintomic cell division resulting in multinucleated cells. These innovations likely facilitated the subsequent evolution of fungal and metazoan multicellularity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Biology
Current Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
869
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Biology is a comprehensive journal that showcases original research in various disciplines of biology. It provides a platform for scientists to disseminate their groundbreaking findings and promotes interdisciplinary communication. The journal publishes articles of general interest, encompassing diverse fields of biology. Moreover, it offers accessible editorial pieces that are specifically designed to enlighten non-specialist readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信