Kayela Arrotta, Brittany Lapin, Margaret Miller, Thomas Hogan, William B Barr, Daniel Friedman, Erica Cotton, Stephan Schuele, Samuel Wiebe, Lara Jehi, Robyn M Busch
{"title":"External validation of the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E).","authors":"Kayela Arrotta, Brittany Lapin, Margaret Miller, Thomas Hogan, William B Barr, Daniel Friedman, Erica Cotton, Stephan Schuele, Samuel Wiebe, Lara Jehi, Robyn M Busch","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 191 patients included in the study (mean age = 41 ± 14, 51 % female, 87 % white race). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 5-factor structure of the MAC-E identified in prior research (CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.069) with high standardized loadings and R<sup>2</sup> values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"110168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to externally validate the Memory Assessment Clinics Scale for Epilepsy (MAC-E), a brief self-report measure of subjective memory complaints in adults with epilepsy.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted including adults with focal pharmacoresistant epilepsy from three Level 4 epilepsy centers in the U.S., who completed the MAC-E as part of a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and goodness-of-fit criteria were calculated to assess model fit: comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR). Item response theory models were constructed, and Mokken analysis was used to assess discrimination and unidimensionality. Internal consistency was evaluated with McDonald's Omega.
Results: There were 191 patients included in the study (mean age = 41 ± 14, 51 % female, 87 % white race). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the 5-factor structure of the MAC-E identified in prior research (CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.069) with high standardized loadings and R2 values for each of the 5 factors (0.58-0.91 and 0.34-0.82, respectively). MAC-E items demonstrated high levels of discrimination as well as the ability to evaluate across the entirety of each latent trait. Score responses were uniformly distributed across latent traits, and unidimensionality was established by factor (all H coefficients > 0.4). Internal consistency was high across factors (omega range: 0.77-0.88).
Conclusions: Results of this study demonstrate good external validation of the MAC-E in an independent, multicenter cohort of adults with epilepsy. These findings provide further support that the MAC-E is a psychometrically valid, self-report instrument to assess every-day memory abilities in adults with epilepsy in both clinical and research settings.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.