Highly branched cyclic dextrin supplementation and resistance training: A randomized double-blinded crossover trial examining mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual responses.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
María Dolores Morenas-Aguilar, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Sara Chacón-Ventura, Juan J Martín-Olmedo, Magdalena Cwiklinska, Pablo Jiménez-Martínez, Carlos Alix-Fages, Danica Janicijevic, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"Highly branched cyclic dextrin supplementation and resistance training: A randomized double-blinded crossover trial examining mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual responses.","authors":"María Dolores Morenas-Aguilar, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Sara Chacón-Ventura, Juan J Martín-Olmedo, Magdalena Cwiklinska, Pablo Jiménez-Martínez, Carlos Alix-Fages, Danica Janicijevic, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the potential ergogenic effects of intra-session supplementation of highly branched cyclic dextrin (HBCD) on mechanical (number of repetitions completed and repetition velocity), metabolic (lactate concentration), and perceptual (gastrointestinal complaints and ratings of perceived exertion [RPE]) responses to resistance training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study design. Thirty physically active individuals (15 men and 15 women) completed two experimental sessions that only differed in the supplement condition (placebo or HBCD). In each experimental session, subjects were prescribed five sets of eight repetitions with the 12-repetition maximum load during the bench press, bench pull, and squat exercises. During the sessions, participants consumed a total of 750 mL of the beverage, which either contained diluted 45 g of cyclic dextrin (HBCD condition) or only 2.5 g of the calorie-free excipients (placebo condition). The supplement (placebo or HBCD) was ingested during the inter-set rest periods (50 mL before each set).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main findings indicated that intra-session HBCD supplementation (i) was well-tolerated without causing gastrointestinal complaints, (ii) led to improved repetition velocity during RT in men but not in women, (iii) tended to generate comparable or higher lactate values, and (iv) did not significantly influence the perception of fatigue.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that HBCD can be considered an ergogenic supplement, particularly for enhancing mechanical performance in men, without noticeably affecting the perception of fatigue or discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":"305-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential ergogenic effects of intra-session supplementation of highly branched cyclic dextrin (HBCD) on mechanical (number of repetitions completed and repetition velocity), metabolic (lactate concentration), and perceptual (gastrointestinal complaints and ratings of perceived exertion [RPE]) responses to resistance training.

Methods: This study used a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study design. Thirty physically active individuals (15 men and 15 women) completed two experimental sessions that only differed in the supplement condition (placebo or HBCD). In each experimental session, subjects were prescribed five sets of eight repetitions with the 12-repetition maximum load during the bench press, bench pull, and squat exercises. During the sessions, participants consumed a total of 750 mL of the beverage, which either contained diluted 45 g of cyclic dextrin (HBCD condition) or only 2.5 g of the calorie-free excipients (placebo condition). The supplement (placebo or HBCD) was ingested during the inter-set rest periods (50 mL before each set).

Results: The main findings indicated that intra-session HBCD supplementation (i) was well-tolerated without causing gastrointestinal complaints, (ii) led to improved repetition velocity during RT in men but not in women, (iii) tended to generate comparable or higher lactate values, and (iv) did not significantly influence the perception of fatigue.

Conclusions: These results suggest that HBCD can be considered an ergogenic supplement, particularly for enhancing mechanical performance in men, without noticeably affecting the perception of fatigue or discomfort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信