Thibault Chassereau, Florence Chapeland-Leclerc, Éric Herbert
{"title":"Full identification of a growing and branching network's spatio-temporal structures.","authors":"Thibault Chassereau, Florence Chapeland-Leclerc, Éric Herbert","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experimentally monitoring the kinematics of branching network growth is a tricky task, given the complexity of the structures generated in three dimensions. One option is to drive the network in such a way as to obtain two-dimensional growth, enabling a collection of independent images to be obtained. The density of the network generates ambiguous structures, such as overlaps and meetings, which hinder the reconstruction of the chronology of connections. In this paper, we propose a general method for global network reconstruction. Each network connection is defined by a unique label, enabling it to be tracked in time and space. In this work, we distinguish between lateral and apical branches on the one hand, and extremities on the other. Finally, we reconstruct the network after identifying and eliminating overlaps. This method is then applied to the model filamentous fungus Podospora anserina to reconstruct its growing thallus. We derive criteria for differentiating between apical and lateral branches. We find that the outer ring is favorably composed of apical branches, while densification within the network comes from lateral branches. From this, we derive the specific dynamics of each of the two types. Finally, in the absence of any latency phase during growth initiation, we can reconstruct a time based on the equality of apical and lateral branching collections. This makes it possible to directly compare the growth dynamics of different thalli.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Experimentally monitoring the kinematics of branching network growth is a tricky task, given the complexity of the structures generated in three dimensions. One option is to drive the network in such a way as to obtain two-dimensional growth, enabling a collection of independent images to be obtained. The density of the network generates ambiguous structures, such as overlaps and meetings, which hinder the reconstruction of the chronology of connections. In this paper, we propose a general method for global network reconstruction. Each network connection is defined by a unique label, enabling it to be tracked in time and space. In this work, we distinguish between lateral and apical branches on the one hand, and extremities on the other. Finally, we reconstruct the network after identifying and eliminating overlaps. This method is then applied to the model filamentous fungus Podospora anserina to reconstruct its growing thallus. We derive criteria for differentiating between apical and lateral branches. We find that the outer ring is favorably composed of apical branches, while densification within the network comes from lateral branches. From this, we derive the specific dynamics of each of the two types. Finally, in the absence of any latency phase during growth initiation, we can reconstruct a time based on the equality of apical and lateral branching collections. This makes it possible to directly compare the growth dynamics of different thalli.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.