Why do healthcare workers refuse tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT)? a qualitative study from Puducherry, South India.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Sadhana Subramanian, Jilisha Gnanadhas, Sonali Sarkar, Manju Rajaram, Senbagavalli Prakashbabu, Palanivel Chinnakali
{"title":"Why do healthcare workers refuse tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT)? a qualitative study from Puducherry, South India.","authors":"Sadhana Subramanian, Jilisha Gnanadhas, Sonali Sarkar, Manju Rajaram, Senbagavalli Prakashbabu, Palanivel Chinnakali","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sustainable development goal (SDG) 3.3.2 prompted India to devise the National Strategic Plan 2017-2025, targeting tuberculosis (TB) eradication by 2030. The prevention pillar of this plan emphasises on Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment (TPT) for those with TB infection (TBI). Healthcare workers (HCWs), identified as one of the high-risk groups by the WHO, show a higher refusal rate for TPT. We aimed to explore the reasons for TPT refusal among the HCWs identified with TBI in Puducherry, South India during 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 12 HCWs from a publicly funded tertiary care hospital, each with at least 5 years of experience. Participants were selected by maximum variation sampling, based on the department of work, current TBI status and subject expertise. The in-depth interviews, guided by the health belief model, lasted approximately 45 min each. Two researchers performed manual thematic analysis using the mixed approach for coding. Codes were grouped into categories and themes. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third researcher, reaching a consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes emerged: perceived threats, beliefs regarding health interventions and empowering factors. Perceived threat elucidated the lower perceived vulnerability of contracting TB and minimal chance for progression of TBI to TB disease despite having continuous exposure and uncertainties in the workplace. Beliefs about health interventions included perceived obstacles and advantages, such as testing challenges and lack of awareness, as well as the benefits of prophylaxis and infection control measures. Empowering factors centred on prompting action and self-confidence, highlighting strategies to encourage TBI testing through administrative actions and endorsing shorter treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing the identified knowledge gaps and false perception through targeted interventions, healthcare institutions can improve TPT uptake. Implementing a comprehensive strategy that combines hospital policies to initiate screening and treatment, a supportive environment and shorter TPT regimens is essential to prevent TB among HCWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The sustainable development goal (SDG) 3.3.2 prompted India to devise the National Strategic Plan 2017-2025, targeting tuberculosis (TB) eradication by 2030. The prevention pillar of this plan emphasises on Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment (TPT) for those with TB infection (TBI). Healthcare workers (HCWs), identified as one of the high-risk groups by the WHO, show a higher refusal rate for TPT. We aimed to explore the reasons for TPT refusal among the HCWs identified with TBI in Puducherry, South India during 2023.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 12 HCWs from a publicly funded tertiary care hospital, each with at least 5 years of experience. Participants were selected by maximum variation sampling, based on the department of work, current TBI status and subject expertise. The in-depth interviews, guided by the health belief model, lasted approximately 45 min each. Two researchers performed manual thematic analysis using the mixed approach for coding. Codes were grouped into categories and themes. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third researcher, reaching a consensus.

Results: Three overarching themes emerged: perceived threats, beliefs regarding health interventions and empowering factors. Perceived threat elucidated the lower perceived vulnerability of contracting TB and minimal chance for progression of TBI to TB disease despite having continuous exposure and uncertainties in the workplace. Beliefs about health interventions included perceived obstacles and advantages, such as testing challenges and lack of awareness, as well as the benefits of prophylaxis and infection control measures. Empowering factors centred on prompting action and self-confidence, highlighting strategies to encourage TBI testing through administrative actions and endorsing shorter treatment plans.

Conclusions: Addressing the identified knowledge gaps and false perception through targeted interventions, healthcare institutions can improve TPT uptake. Implementing a comprehensive strategy that combines hospital policies to initiate screening and treatment, a supportive environment and shorter TPT regimens is essential to prevent TB among HCWs.

为什么卫生保健工作者拒绝结核病预防治疗?来自印度南部普杜切里的一项定性研究。
背景:可持续发展目标(SDG) 3.3.2促使印度制定2017-2025年国家战略计划,目标是到2030年根除结核病。该计划的预防支柱强调对结核病感染者进行结核病预防治疗。卫生保健工作者(HCWs)被世界卫生组织确定为高危人群之一,对TPT的拒绝率较高。我们的目的是探讨2023年印度南部普杜切里确诊为TBI的医护人员拒绝接受TPT治疗的原因。方法:对一家公立三级医院的12名卫生保健员进行定性描述性研究,每位卫生保健员至少有5年的工作经验。根据工作部门、当前TBI状态和受试者专业知识,采用最大变异抽样法选择参与者。在健康信念模型的指导下,深度访谈每次持续约45分钟。两位研究人员使用混合编码方法进行手动主题分析。代码按类别和主题分组。通过与第三位研究者的讨论,解决了差异,达成了共识。结果:出现了三个总体主题:感知到的威胁、对保健干预措施的信念和增强能力的因素。感知威胁阐明了尽管在工作场所持续暴露和不确定,但感染结核病的感知脆弱性较低,TBI发展为结核病的可能性很小。对保健干预措施的看法包括认为存在的障碍和优势,例如检测方面的挑战和缺乏认识,以及预防和感染控制措施的好处。授权因素集中于促进行动和自信,强调通过行政行动鼓励TBI测试的战略,并赞同较短的治疗计划。结论:通过有针对性的干预措施解决已确定的知识差距和错误认知,医疗机构可以提高TPT的吸收。实施一项综合战略,将启动筛查和治疗的医院政策、支持性环境和较短的TPT治疗方案结合起来,对于在卫生保健工作者中预防结核病至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信