Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides fragilis strains collected from different clinical origins.

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Yanyan Wang, Juan Wen, Binxin Guo, Wenqi Zheng, Junrui Wang
{"title":"Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides fragilis strains collected from different clinical origins.","authors":"Yanyan Wang, Juan Wen, Binxin Guo, Wenqi Zheng, Junrui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Strains of carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides fragilis have frequently emerged in recent years. In China, data on the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of these antimicrobial-resistant anaerobic bacteria are scarce. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterize clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis collected from a tertiary hospital in China using whole genome sequencing (WGS), phenotypic susceptibility tests, and a biofilm formation assay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 49 B. fragilis strains with different antimicrobial resistance profiles. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the agar dilution method and biofilm formation using a crystal violet assay. Genomic characteristics were analyzed using WGS, and the transcription level of cfiA, which is responsible for carbapenem resistance, was determined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Carbapenem-sensitive isolates were used as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 49 B. fragilis isolates were biofilm producers and the percentage of carbapenem-resistant isolates was 42.86 % (21/49). The percentage of carbapenem-resistant isolates with medium-to-strong biofilm production ability was significantly lower than that of carbapenem-sensitive isolates (19.1 % vs. 88.9 %, p < 0.01). None of the carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis isolates carried bft. In contrast, 53.6 % (15/28) of the carbapenem-sensitive isolates carried bft, and all of them were fpn(+). All carbapenem-resistant isolates (21/21, 100 %) harbored cfiA and its upstream insertion sequence (IS) element. Three isolates (BF058, BF059, and BF060) carried the IS613 element, which was not immediately adjacent upstream to cfiA but was separated by a 1000-kb sequence encoding vatD. The quantitative PCR assay results revealed the elevated expression of cfiA mRNA among carbapenem-resistant isolates, although the relative expression levels varied greatly among isolates. However, a significant correlation between the relative expression level of cfiA mRNA and phenotypic carbapenem resistance was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis isolates carried a low frequency of virulence-related genes and showed weaker biofilm formation ability compared with carbapenem-sensitive B. fragilis isolates. CfiA was the dominant mediator of carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis. This study was the first to identify the structural plasticity of the cfiA-IS element, emphasizing the diverse and complex evolution of carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis, which warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8050,"journal":{"name":"Anaerobe","volume":" ","pages":"102924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaerobe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Strains of carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides fragilis have frequently emerged in recent years. In China, data on the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of these antimicrobial-resistant anaerobic bacteria are scarce. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterize clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis collected from a tertiary hospital in China using whole genome sequencing (WGS), phenotypic susceptibility tests, and a biofilm formation assay.

Methods: We analyzed 49 B. fragilis strains with different antimicrobial resistance profiles. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the agar dilution method and biofilm formation using a crystal violet assay. Genomic characteristics were analyzed using WGS, and the transcription level of cfiA, which is responsible for carbapenem resistance, was determined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Carbapenem-sensitive isolates were used as controls.

Results: All 49 B. fragilis isolates were biofilm producers and the percentage of carbapenem-resistant isolates was 42.86 % (21/49). The percentage of carbapenem-resistant isolates with medium-to-strong biofilm production ability was significantly lower than that of carbapenem-sensitive isolates (19.1 % vs. 88.9 %, p < 0.01). None of the carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis isolates carried bft. In contrast, 53.6 % (15/28) of the carbapenem-sensitive isolates carried bft, and all of them were fpn(+). All carbapenem-resistant isolates (21/21, 100 %) harbored cfiA and its upstream insertion sequence (IS) element. Three isolates (BF058, BF059, and BF060) carried the IS613 element, which was not immediately adjacent upstream to cfiA but was separated by a 1000-kb sequence encoding vatD. The quantitative PCR assay results revealed the elevated expression of cfiA mRNA among carbapenem-resistant isolates, although the relative expression levels varied greatly among isolates. However, a significant correlation between the relative expression level of cfiA mRNA and phenotypic carbapenem resistance was observed.

Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis isolates carried a low frequency of virulence-related genes and showed weaker biofilm formation ability compared with carbapenem-sensitive B. fragilis isolates. CfiA was the dominant mediator of carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis. This study was the first to identify the structural plasticity of the cfiA-IS element, emphasizing the diverse and complex evolution of carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis, which warrants further investigation.

不同临床来源耐碳青霉烯脆弱拟杆菌的基因型和表型多样性。
目的:近年来,碳青霉烯类耐药脆弱拟杆菌频繁出现。在中国,关于这些耐药厌氧菌的基因型和表型特征的数据很少。因此,本研究的目的是利用全基因组测序(WGS)、表型敏感性试验和生物膜形成试验对从中国某三级医院收集的耐碳青霉烯脆弱芽孢杆菌临床分离株进行鉴定。方法对49株不同耐药谱的脆弱芽孢杆菌进行分析。采用琼脂稀释法和结晶紫法测定生物膜的形成。利用WGS分析基因组特征,并利用定量反转录聚合酶链反应(PCR)测定cfiA的转录水平,cfiA是导致碳青霉烯类耐药性的基因。碳青霉烯敏感菌株作为对照。结果:49株脆弱芽孢杆菌均能产生生物膜,耐碳青霉烯菌占42.86%(21/49)。碳青霉烯耐药菌株产膜能力中等至较强的比例显著低于碳青霉烯敏感菌株(19.1%比88.9%,p< 0.01)。耐碳青霉烯脆弱芽孢杆菌分离株均未携带bft。53.6%(15/28)的碳青霉烯敏感菌株携带bft,且均为fpn(+)。所有碳青霉烯耐药菌株(21/21,100%)均含有cfiA及其上游插入序列(IS)元件。三个分离株(BF058、BF059和BF060)携带IS613元件,该元件不是直接与cfiA上游相邻,而是由编码vatD的1000 kb序列分隔。定量PCR检测结果显示,cfiA mRNA在碳青霉烯耐药菌株中表达量升高,但不同菌株的相对表达量差异较大。然而,cfiA mRNA的相对表达量与碳青霉烯耐药表型之间存在显著相关性。结论:碳青霉烯耐药脆弱芽孢杆菌分离株携带的毒力相关基因频率较低,生物膜形成能力较碳青霉烯敏感脆弱芽孢杆菌弱。CfiA是脆弱芽孢杆菌对碳青霉烯类耐药的主要媒介。本研究首次确定了cfiA-IS元件的结构可塑性,强调了脆弱芽孢杆菌碳青霉烯类耐药的多样性和复杂性,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaerobe
Anaerobe 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Anaerobe is essential reading for those who wish to remain at the forefront of discoveries relating to life processes of strictly anaerobes. The journal is multi-disciplinary, and provides a unique forum for those investigating anaerobic organisms that cause infections in humans and animals, as well as anaerobes that play roles in microbiomes or environmental processes. Anaerobe publishes reviews, mini reviews, original research articles, notes and case reports. Relevant topics fall into the broad categories of anaerobes in human and animal diseases, anaerobes in the microbiome, anaerobes in the environment, diagnosis of anaerobes in clinical microbiology laboratories, molecular biology, genetics, pathogenesis, toxins and antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信