Matrix effect evaluation using multi-component post-column infusion in untargeted hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry plasma metabolomics

IF 4 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Mengle Zhu , Lieke Lamont , Pascal Maas , Amy C. Harms , Marian Beekman , P. Eline Slagboom , Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman , Thomas Hankemeier
{"title":"Matrix effect evaluation using multi-component post-column infusion in untargeted hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry plasma metabolomics","authors":"Mengle Zhu ,&nbsp;Lieke Lamont ,&nbsp;Pascal Maas ,&nbsp;Amy C. Harms ,&nbsp;Marian Beekman ,&nbsp;P. Eline Slagboom ,&nbsp;Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman ,&nbsp;Thomas Hankemeier","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metabolomics based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for polar metabolite identification and quantification to further contribute to biomarker discovery and disease mechanism elucidation. However, matrix effect (ME), which may lead to altered ionization efficiency due to co-eluting compounds, is a significant challenge during biological analysis. Therefore, ME evaluation plays a crucial role during method development. Two approaches to evaluate ME are using stable isotope labelled-internal standards (SIL-IS) and post-column infusion (PCI) of standards. In this study, we developed an untargeted HILIC-MS method by applying four PCI standards for ME evaluation. We found PCI is a compelling approach for ME assessment compared to SIL-IS method due to its advantage in untargeted analysis. Through the ME evaluation and chromatographic performance comparison of 18 SIL standards across three columns and three different mobile phase pH conditions, our findings revealed that the BEH-Z-HILIC column operated at pH 4 with 10 mM ammonium formate exhibited minimal ME and superior performance. The method showed exceptional linearity (R² &gt; 0.98), reliable repeatability (RSD &lt; 15 %), good inter-day precision (RSD &lt; 30 %), and acceptable recovery (&gt;75 %) for all SIL standards. Absolute matrix effect (AME) and relative matrix effect (RME) assessment in three plasma donors revealed a high consistency between PCI and SIL-IS approaches. Finally, this method coupled with the PCI approach was applied to 40 plasma samples. Fifty endogenous compounds were detected and their AME and RME were evaluated. Results showed that many compounds experienced severe ion suppression, though their ME variation between 40 samples is low. In conclusion, PCI method is a robust alternative for monitoring ME and evaluating ME of endogenous compounds during untargeted method optimization and biological analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1740 ","pages":"Article 465580"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967324009531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolomics based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for polar metabolite identification and quantification to further contribute to biomarker discovery and disease mechanism elucidation. However, matrix effect (ME), which may lead to altered ionization efficiency due to co-eluting compounds, is a significant challenge during biological analysis. Therefore, ME evaluation plays a crucial role during method development. Two approaches to evaluate ME are using stable isotope labelled-internal standards (SIL-IS) and post-column infusion (PCI) of standards. In this study, we developed an untargeted HILIC-MS method by applying four PCI standards for ME evaluation. We found PCI is a compelling approach for ME assessment compared to SIL-IS method due to its advantage in untargeted analysis. Through the ME evaluation and chromatographic performance comparison of 18 SIL standards across three columns and three different mobile phase pH conditions, our findings revealed that the BEH-Z-HILIC column operated at pH 4 with 10 mM ammonium formate exhibited minimal ME and superior performance. The method showed exceptional linearity (R² > 0.98), reliable repeatability (RSD < 15 %), good inter-day precision (RSD < 30 %), and acceptable recovery (>75 %) for all SIL standards. Absolute matrix effect (AME) and relative matrix effect (RME) assessment in three plasma donors revealed a high consistency between PCI and SIL-IS approaches. Finally, this method coupled with the PCI approach was applied to 40 plasma samples. Fifty endogenous compounds were detected and their AME and RME were evaluated. Results showed that many compounds experienced severe ion suppression, though their ME variation between 40 samples is low. In conclusion, PCI method is a robust alternative for monitoring ME and evaluating ME of endogenous compounds during untargeted method optimization and biological analysis.
非靶向亲水性相互作用多组分柱后输注基质效应评价液相色谱-质谱血浆代谢组学。
基于亲水相互作用液相色谱(HILIC)和质谱(MS)的代谢组学是极性代谢物鉴定和定量的有力工具,有助于进一步发现生物标志物和阐明疾病机制。然而,基质效应(ME)是生物分析中的一个重大挑战,它可能导致化合物共洗脱导致电离效率的改变。因此,ME评价在方法开发过程中起着至关重要的作用。评估ME的两种方法是使用稳定同位素标记内标(SIL-IS)和柱后输注(PCI)标准。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种非靶向HILIC-MS方法,应用四种PCI标准进行ME评估。我们发现与SIL-IS方法相比,PCI是一种令人信服的ME评估方法,因为它在非靶向分析方面具有优势。通过对18种SIL标准品在三种不同流动相pH条件下的代谢能评价和色谱性能比较,我们的研究结果表明,在pH为4、10 mM甲酸铵条件下,behh - z - hilic柱的代谢能最小,性能优越。该方法具有良好的线性(R²> 0.98)、可靠的重复性(RSD < 15%)、良好的日间精密度(RSD < 30%)和可接受的回收率(> 75%)。三名血浆供者的绝对基质效应(AME)和相对基质效应(RME)评估显示PCI和SIL-IS方法之间的高度一致性。最后,将该方法与PCI方法结合应用于40份血浆样本。检测了50种内源性化合物,并对其AME和RME进行了评价。结果表明,许多化合物经历了严重的离子抑制,尽管它们在40个样品之间的ME变化很低。综上所述,在非靶向方法优化和生物分析中,PCI法是监测内源性化合物代谢能和评估内源性化合物代谢能的可靠替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信