Matrix effect evaluation using multi-component post-column infusion in untargeted hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry plasma metabolomics.

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Mengle Zhu, Lieke Lamont, Pascal Maas, Amy C Harms, Marian Beekman, P Eline Slagboom, Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman, Thomas Hankemeier
{"title":"Matrix effect evaluation using multi-component post-column infusion in untargeted hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry plasma metabolomics.","authors":"Mengle Zhu, Lieke Lamont, Pascal Maas, Amy C Harms, Marian Beekman, P Eline Slagboom, Anne-Charlotte Dubbelman, Thomas Hankemeier","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metabolomics based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for polar metabolite identification and quantification to further contribute to biomarker discovery and disease mechanism elucidation. However, matrix effect (ME), which may lead to altered ionization efficiency due to co-eluting compounds, is a significant challenge during biological analysis. Therefore, ME evaluation plays a crucial role during method development. Two approaches to evaluate ME are using stable isotope labelled-internal standards (SIL-IS) and post-column infusion (PCI) of standards. In this study, we developed an untargeted HILIC-MS method by applying four PCI standards for ME evaluation. We found PCI is a compelling approach for ME assessment compared to SIL-IS method due to its advantage in untargeted analysis. Through the ME evaluation and chromatographic performance comparison of 18 SIL standards across three columns and three different mobile phase pH conditions, our findings revealed that the BEH-Z-HILIC column operated at pH 4 with 10 mM ammonium formate exhibited minimal ME and superior performance. The method showed exceptional linearity (R² > 0.98), reliable repeatability (RSD < 15 %), good inter-day precision (RSD < 30 %), and acceptable recovery (>75 %) for all SIL standards. Absolute matrix effect (AME) and relative matrix effect (RME) assessment in three plasma donors revealed a high consistency between PCI and SIL-IS approaches. Finally, this method coupled with the PCI approach was applied to 40 plasma samples. Fifty endogenous compounds were detected and their AME and RME were evaluated. Results showed that many compounds experienced severe ion suppression, though their ME variation between 40 samples is low. In conclusion, PCI method is a robust alternative for monitoring ME and evaluating ME of endogenous compounds during untargeted method optimization and biological analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1740 ","pages":"465580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolomics based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for polar metabolite identification and quantification to further contribute to biomarker discovery and disease mechanism elucidation. However, matrix effect (ME), which may lead to altered ionization efficiency due to co-eluting compounds, is a significant challenge during biological analysis. Therefore, ME evaluation plays a crucial role during method development. Two approaches to evaluate ME are using stable isotope labelled-internal standards (SIL-IS) and post-column infusion (PCI) of standards. In this study, we developed an untargeted HILIC-MS method by applying four PCI standards for ME evaluation. We found PCI is a compelling approach for ME assessment compared to SIL-IS method due to its advantage in untargeted analysis. Through the ME evaluation and chromatographic performance comparison of 18 SIL standards across three columns and three different mobile phase pH conditions, our findings revealed that the BEH-Z-HILIC column operated at pH 4 with 10 mM ammonium formate exhibited minimal ME and superior performance. The method showed exceptional linearity (R² > 0.98), reliable repeatability (RSD < 15 %), good inter-day precision (RSD < 30 %), and acceptable recovery (>75 %) for all SIL standards. Absolute matrix effect (AME) and relative matrix effect (RME) assessment in three plasma donors revealed a high consistency between PCI and SIL-IS approaches. Finally, this method coupled with the PCI approach was applied to 40 plasma samples. Fifty endogenous compounds were detected and their AME and RME were evaluated. Results showed that many compounds experienced severe ion suppression, though their ME variation between 40 samples is low. In conclusion, PCI method is a robust alternative for monitoring ME and evaluating ME of endogenous compounds during untargeted method optimization and biological analysis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信