Suffusion characteristics of a heterogeneous dam foundation with a cut-off wall of stochastic defects

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Zezhi Deng, Gang Wang, Wei Jin, Liangjun Deng, Mingke Liao, Qiuyi Chen
{"title":"Suffusion characteristics of a heterogeneous dam foundation with a cut-off wall of stochastic defects","authors":"Zezhi Deng, Gang Wang, Wei Jin, Liangjun Deng, Mingke Liao, Qiuyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural alluvial foundations are inherently heterogeneous. To enhance seepage safety, a cut-off wall is commonly embedded in a dam foundation. However, walls can also have stochastic defects. The dual uncertainties arising from soil heterogeneity and wall defects pose significant challenges for seepage safety evaluation. In this study, systematic numerical simulations were conducted on an internally unstable dam foundation based on a four-constituent mixture framework. Soil heterogeneity was characterized by stochastic initial hydraulic conductivity and initial fines content. An erosion model, specifically incorporating the influence of overburden pressure, was employed to quantify suffusion. A probabilistic assessment utilizing Monte Carlo simulations revealed that suffusion in heterogeneous fields could be more severe than that in homogeneous fields. Various combinations of stochastic soil properties and defect locations can result in substantial disparities in seepage and erosion fields. The mean values of the total flux and the fines eroded ratio are insensitive to the spatial variation length, while their deviations increase with increasing spatial variation length, leading to larger uncertainties in the leakage channel morphology. For highly heterogeneous alluvial foundations with large spatial variations, conventional seepage and suffusion analyses that rely on homogeneous assumptions may considerably underestimate the internal erosion risk.","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural alluvial foundations are inherently heterogeneous. To enhance seepage safety, a cut-off wall is commonly embedded in a dam foundation. However, walls can also have stochastic defects. The dual uncertainties arising from soil heterogeneity and wall defects pose significant challenges for seepage safety evaluation. In this study, systematic numerical simulations were conducted on an internally unstable dam foundation based on a four-constituent mixture framework. Soil heterogeneity was characterized by stochastic initial hydraulic conductivity and initial fines content. An erosion model, specifically incorporating the influence of overburden pressure, was employed to quantify suffusion. A probabilistic assessment utilizing Monte Carlo simulations revealed that suffusion in heterogeneous fields could be more severe than that in homogeneous fields. Various combinations of stochastic soil properties and defect locations can result in substantial disparities in seepage and erosion fields. The mean values of the total flux and the fines eroded ratio are insensitive to the spatial variation length, while their deviations increase with increasing spatial variation length, leading to larger uncertainties in the leakage channel morphology. For highly heterogeneous alluvial foundations with large spatial variations, conventional seepage and suffusion analyses that rely on homogeneous assumptions may considerably underestimate the internal erosion risk.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信