{"title":"Suffusion characteristics of a heterogeneous dam foundation with a cut-off wall of stochastic defects","authors":"Zezhi Deng, Gang Wang, Wei Jin, Liangjun Deng, Mingke Liao, Qiuyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural alluvial foundations are inherently heterogeneous. To enhance seepage safety, a cut-off wall is commonly embedded in a dam foundation. However, walls can also have stochastic defects. The dual uncertainties arising from soil heterogeneity and wall defects pose significant challenges for seepage safety evaluation. In this study, systematic numerical simulations were conducted on an internally unstable dam foundation based on a four-constituent mixture framework. Soil heterogeneity was characterized by stochastic initial hydraulic conductivity and initial fines content. An erosion model, specifically incorporating the influence of overburden pressure, was employed to quantify suffusion. A probabilistic assessment utilizing Monte Carlo simulations revealed that suffusion in heterogeneous fields could be more severe than that in homogeneous fields. Various combinations of stochastic soil properties and defect locations can result in substantial disparities in seepage and erosion fields. The mean values of the total flux and the fines eroded ratio are insensitive to the spatial variation length, while their deviations increase with increasing spatial variation length, leading to larger uncertainties in the leakage channel morphology. For highly heterogeneous alluvial foundations with large spatial variations, conventional seepage and suffusion analyses that rely on homogeneous assumptions may considerably underestimate the internal erosion risk.","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Natural alluvial foundations are inherently heterogeneous. To enhance seepage safety, a cut-off wall is commonly embedded in a dam foundation. However, walls can also have stochastic defects. The dual uncertainties arising from soil heterogeneity and wall defects pose significant challenges for seepage safety evaluation. In this study, systematic numerical simulations were conducted on an internally unstable dam foundation based on a four-constituent mixture framework. Soil heterogeneity was characterized by stochastic initial hydraulic conductivity and initial fines content. An erosion model, specifically incorporating the influence of overburden pressure, was employed to quantify suffusion. A probabilistic assessment utilizing Monte Carlo simulations revealed that suffusion in heterogeneous fields could be more severe than that in homogeneous fields. Various combinations of stochastic soil properties and defect locations can result in substantial disparities in seepage and erosion fields. The mean values of the total flux and the fines eroded ratio are insensitive to the spatial variation length, while their deviations increase with increasing spatial variation length, leading to larger uncertainties in the leakage channel morphology. For highly heterogeneous alluvial foundations with large spatial variations, conventional seepage and suffusion analyses that rely on homogeneous assumptions may considerably underestimate the internal erosion risk.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.