Urban equity of park use in peri-urban areas during the Covid-19 pandemic

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Yangyi Wu , Yehua Dennis Wei , Meitong Liu , Ivis García
{"title":"Urban equity of park use in peri-urban areas during the Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Yangyi Wu ,&nbsp;Yehua Dennis Wei ,&nbsp;Meitong Liu ,&nbsp;Ivis García","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies of parks underscore the significance of park equity, considering both its quantity and quality. However, the vulnerability of <em>peri</em>-urban communities, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic concerning park utilization, goes beyond what objective assessments of access and quality can capture. Based on a multidimensional and comparative framework and combining objective evaluation and subjective perceptions and demands, this study explores park equity within Salt Lake City during COVID-19, spotlighting variations between urban and <em>peri</em>-urban areas. The analysis identifies pronounced regional disparities in park equity measures. The southern <em>peri</em>-urban community is identified as a disadvantaged group regarding accessibility by traditional spatial measures, yet their own perception of accessibility remains optimistic. While the urban center and west <em>peri</em>-urban groups generally share similar objective accessibility indices, their perceptions vary, and a discernible west-east disparity in park quality emerges, especially in terms of amenities. The analysis of demands and preferences also shows that western residents have a higher need for essential infrastructure enhancements to offset their current underdeveloped parks. The COVID-19 pandemic further magnified these disparities, emphasizing western communities’ vulnerabilities as they are more likely to be affected by quality perception issues than the other two groups. Additionally, the intricate and non-linear dynamics of park visitation choices during the pandemic highlight the necessity for a cross-disciplinary synthesis in urban planning paradigms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 105269"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624002688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of parks underscore the significance of park equity, considering both its quantity and quality. However, the vulnerability of peri-urban communities, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic concerning park utilization, goes beyond what objective assessments of access and quality can capture. Based on a multidimensional and comparative framework and combining objective evaluation and subjective perceptions and demands, this study explores park equity within Salt Lake City during COVID-19, spotlighting variations between urban and peri-urban areas. The analysis identifies pronounced regional disparities in park equity measures. The southern peri-urban community is identified as a disadvantaged group regarding accessibility by traditional spatial measures, yet their own perception of accessibility remains optimistic. While the urban center and west peri-urban groups generally share similar objective accessibility indices, their perceptions vary, and a discernible west-east disparity in park quality emerges, especially in terms of amenities. The analysis of demands and preferences also shows that western residents have a higher need for essential infrastructure enhancements to offset their current underdeveloped parks. The COVID-19 pandemic further magnified these disparities, emphasizing western communities’ vulnerabilities as they are more likely to be affected by quality perception issues than the other two groups. Additionally, the intricate and non-linear dynamics of park visitation choices during the pandemic highlight the necessity for a cross-disciplinary synthesis in urban planning paradigms.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间城郊地区公园使用的城市公平性
公园的研究强调了公园公平的重要性,从数量和质量两个方面考虑。然而,城郊社区的脆弱性,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,超出了对可及性和质量的客观评估所能捕捉到的范围。本研究基于多维比较框架,结合客观评价和主观感知与需求,探讨了2019冠状病毒病疫情期间盐湖城公园的公平性,突出了城市和城郊地区之间的差异。分析表明,在公园公平措施方面存在明显的地区差异。通过传统的空间测量,南部近郊社区在可达性方面被确定为弱势群体,但他们自己对可达性的看法仍然乐观。虽然城市中心和西部城郊群体普遍具有相似的客观可达性指标,但他们的感知却存在差异,并且在公园质量方面出现了明显的东西差异,特别是在设施方面。对需求和偏好的分析也表明,西部居民对基本基础设施的改善有更高的需求,以抵消他们目前不发达的公园。2019冠状病毒病大流行进一步扩大了这些差距,凸显了西方社区的脆弱性,因为他们比其他两个群体更容易受到质量认知问题的影响。此外,大流行期间公园游客选择的复杂和非线性动态突出了跨学科综合城市规划范式的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信