Flume investigation of debris flow entrained boulders with cylindrical baffles and a rigid barrier

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Beom-Jun Kim, Chan-Young Yune
{"title":"Flume investigation of debris flow entrained boulders with cylindrical baffles and a rigid barrier","authors":"Beom-Jun Kim, Chan-Young Yune","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large boulders entrained by debris flow can generate destructive impact force and cause significant damage to a rigid barrier located downstream. Baffle arrays can be installed in front of the rigid barrier to reduce the potential damage from large boulders by dissipating flow energy with filtering boulders from the debris flows. In this study, to investigate the effect of baffle arrays on the flow behavior and the dynamic impact force of debris flows acting on the terminal barrier, small-scale flume experiments were performed with various baffle configurations. After the experiments, the dynamic flow behavior with boulders, impact forces, and travel distances of boulders, were analyzed with transverse blockage ratios and numbers of baffle rows. As a result, entrained boulders in debris flows significantly increased impact force about six times. With the installations of baffle arrays, however, peak impact force decreased by an average of 70 % and by up to 94 %. In addition, increasing the number of rows of baffles from one to two led to an average reduction of 50 % in impact force for each transverse blockage ratio. However, in the case of one row of baffles, the impact force reduction for high <ce:italic>s/δ</ce:italic> values proved to be less effective compared to the other baffle configurations. Finally, the results of this study can provide appropriate ranges for the baffle spacing and the number of baffle rows in the baffle design to estimate the load attenuation due to boulder filtration.","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"225 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large boulders entrained by debris flow can generate destructive impact force and cause significant damage to a rigid barrier located downstream. Baffle arrays can be installed in front of the rigid barrier to reduce the potential damage from large boulders by dissipating flow energy with filtering boulders from the debris flows. In this study, to investigate the effect of baffle arrays on the flow behavior and the dynamic impact force of debris flows acting on the terminal barrier, small-scale flume experiments were performed with various baffle configurations. After the experiments, the dynamic flow behavior with boulders, impact forces, and travel distances of boulders, were analyzed with transverse blockage ratios and numbers of baffle rows. As a result, entrained boulders in debris flows significantly increased impact force about six times. With the installations of baffle arrays, however, peak impact force decreased by an average of 70 % and by up to 94 %. In addition, increasing the number of rows of baffles from one to two led to an average reduction of 50 % in impact force for each transverse blockage ratio. However, in the case of one row of baffles, the impact force reduction for high s/δ values proved to be less effective compared to the other baffle configurations. Finally, the results of this study can provide appropriate ranges for the baffle spacing and the number of baffle rows in the baffle design to estimate the load attenuation due to boulder filtration.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信