Theories of firms and the emergence of multinational enterprises: the organizational and managerial implications of solving transactional problems versus creating exchange value
{"title":"Theories of firms and the emergence of multinational enterprises: the organizational and managerial implications of solving transactional problems versus creating exchange value","authors":"Jay B. Barney, Ilze Kivleniece, Anita M. McGahan","doi":"10.1057/s41267-024-00759-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teece (J Int Bus Stud 45(1):8–37, 2014) identifies two theories of the emergence of multinational enterprises (MNEs)—one that focuses on how MNEs solve transactional difficulties that can emerge in market exchanges and another that focuses on how MNEs facilitate economic value creation that is difficult to realize through market exchanges—and suggests that both theories are important in understanding MNE emergence. However, the organizational and managerial implications of these two theories are very different. MNEs that solve transactional difficulties are typically hierarchical in nature, where senior managers exercise managerial fiat to direct subordinates, firm boundaries are well defined, and subordinate behavior is monitored to minimize opportunism. MNEs that create economic value are typically less hierarchical, involve the creation of cooperative relations among stakeholders to facilitate co-specialized investments, have less well-defined boundaries, and reduce the threat of opportunism by ensuring that stakeholders gain more continuing in this exchange than other exchanges. The organizational and managerial implications of these two theories suggest that MNEs that form to both solve transactional difficulties <i>and</i> to create economic value will face difficult challenges trying to reconcile the organizational and management imperatives implied by these theories. This paper concludes by discussing how MNEs might address these organizational and managerial conflicts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Business Studies","volume":"225 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00759-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teece (J Int Bus Stud 45(1):8–37, 2014) identifies two theories of the emergence of multinational enterprises (MNEs)—one that focuses on how MNEs solve transactional difficulties that can emerge in market exchanges and another that focuses on how MNEs facilitate economic value creation that is difficult to realize through market exchanges—and suggests that both theories are important in understanding MNE emergence. However, the organizational and managerial implications of these two theories are very different. MNEs that solve transactional difficulties are typically hierarchical in nature, where senior managers exercise managerial fiat to direct subordinates, firm boundaries are well defined, and subordinate behavior is monitored to minimize opportunism. MNEs that create economic value are typically less hierarchical, involve the creation of cooperative relations among stakeholders to facilitate co-specialized investments, have less well-defined boundaries, and reduce the threat of opportunism by ensuring that stakeholders gain more continuing in this exchange than other exchanges. The organizational and managerial implications of these two theories suggest that MNEs that form to both solve transactional difficulties and to create economic value will face difficult challenges trying to reconcile the organizational and management imperatives implied by these theories. This paper concludes by discussing how MNEs might address these organizational and managerial conflicts.
Teece (J Int Bus Stud 45(1): 8-37, 2014)确定了跨国企业(MNEs)出现的两种理论——一种侧重于跨国公司如何解决市场交换中可能出现的交易困难,另一种侧重于跨国公司如何促进难以通过市场交换实现的经济价值创造——并表明这两种理论对理解跨国公司的出现都很重要。然而,这两种理论的组织和管理含义是非常不同的。解决交易困难的跨国公司本质上通常是等级分明的,高级管理人员对下属实施管理命令,公司边界明确界定,下属行为受到监控,以最大限度地减少机会主义。创造经济价值的跨国公司通常等级较低,涉及在利益相关者之间建立合作关系以促进共同专业化投资,边界不太明确,并通过确保利益相关者在这种交换中获得比其他交换更多的持续性来减少机会主义的威胁。这两种理论对组织和管理的影响表明,那些既要解决交易困难又要创造经济价值的跨国公司将面临艰难的挑战,试图调和这些理论所隐含的组织和管理要求。本文最后讨论了跨国公司如何解决这些组织和管理冲突。
期刊介绍:
The Selection Committee for the JIBS Decade Award is pleased to announce that the 2023 award will be presented to Anthony Goerzen, Christian Geisler Asmussen, and Bo Bernhard Nielsen for their article titled "Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy," published in JIBS in 2013 (volume 44, issue 5, pages 427-450).
The prestigious JIBS Decade Award, sponsored by Palgrave Macmillan, recognizes the most influential paper published in the Journal of International Business Studies from a decade earlier. The award will be presented at the annual AIB conference.
To be eligible for the JIBS Decade Award, an article must be one of the top five most cited papers published in JIBS for the respective year. The Selection Committee for this year included Kaz Asakawa, Jeremy Clegg, Catherine Welch, and Rosalie L. Tung, serving as the Committee Chair and JIBS Editor-in-Chief, all from distinguished universities around the world.