Yue Zhi, Xiaoqing Zhao, Ao Shuai, Yonghui Jia, Xinyi Cheng, Shihong Lin, Feng Xiao, Le Han, Hongxiang Chai, Qiang He, Caihong Liu
{"title":"Enhancing Rejection of Short-chain Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances by Tailoring the Surface Charge of Nanofiltration Membranes","authors":"Yue Zhi, Xiaoqing Zhao, Ao Shuai, Yonghui Jia, Xinyi Cheng, Shihong Lin, Feng Xiao, Le Han, Hongxiang Chai, Qiang He, Caihong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nanofiltration (NF) effectively removes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from water but struggles with short-chain PFAS (i.e., those containing less than 6 perfluorinated carbons) due to size exclusion inefficiency. In this study, we developed layer-by-layer assembled NF membranes with PDADMAC/PSS terminal bilayers varying in chain lengths, hydrophilicity, and charge, and systematically assessed their removal of 16 representative PFAS species. The mechanisms between long-chain and short-chain PFAS were investigated and optimal strategies for enhancing PFAS selectivity were developed. Results demonstrated that the (PDADMAC/PSS)<sub>3</sub> membrane achieved the highest removal (86.1%-98.1%) for short-chain PFAS, including PFBA-PFHpA (C4-C6), PFBS (C4), PFMOPrA (C3), PFMOBA (C4), and GenX (C5), while effectively removing (>99.9%) long-chain counterparts (C7-8). As feed water pH increased from 3.5 to 9, average PFAS rejection rose from 16.6% to 32.0%, revealing more negative charged membrane surface endow stronger electrostatic repulsion, particularly for short-chain anionic PFAS. In addition, we also tested the PFAS removal efficacy of (PDADMAC/PSS)<sub>3</sub> membrane using real sewage plant effluent. Compared to the pristine membrane, the (PDADMAC/PSS)<sub>3</sub> membrane exhibited improved removal for most PFAS, with removal efficiencies ranging from 82.54% for PFOA to 96.71% for PFOS. The most significant improvements were observed in C4 compounds like PFBA and PFBS (increased by 6.0-11.5%). Our study suggests that PFAS removal efficiency by NF highly depends on size exclusion, with short-chain anionic PFAS more likely affected by electrostatic repulsion. Membrane surface manipulation can enhance selectivity, aiding in predicting NF treatment effectiveness for specific PFAS compounds.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122931","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nanofiltration (NF) effectively removes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from water but struggles with short-chain PFAS (i.e., those containing less than 6 perfluorinated carbons) due to size exclusion inefficiency. In this study, we developed layer-by-layer assembled NF membranes with PDADMAC/PSS terminal bilayers varying in chain lengths, hydrophilicity, and charge, and systematically assessed their removal of 16 representative PFAS species. The mechanisms between long-chain and short-chain PFAS were investigated and optimal strategies for enhancing PFAS selectivity were developed. Results demonstrated that the (PDADMAC/PSS)3 membrane achieved the highest removal (86.1%-98.1%) for short-chain PFAS, including PFBA-PFHpA (C4-C6), PFBS (C4), PFMOPrA (C3), PFMOBA (C4), and GenX (C5), while effectively removing (>99.9%) long-chain counterparts (C7-8). As feed water pH increased from 3.5 to 9, average PFAS rejection rose from 16.6% to 32.0%, revealing more negative charged membrane surface endow stronger electrostatic repulsion, particularly for short-chain anionic PFAS. In addition, we also tested the PFAS removal efficacy of (PDADMAC/PSS)3 membrane using real sewage plant effluent. Compared to the pristine membrane, the (PDADMAC/PSS)3 membrane exhibited improved removal for most PFAS, with removal efficiencies ranging from 82.54% for PFOA to 96.71% for PFOS. The most significant improvements were observed in C4 compounds like PFBA and PFBS (increased by 6.0-11.5%). Our study suggests that PFAS removal efficiency by NF highly depends on size exclusion, with short-chain anionic PFAS more likely affected by electrostatic repulsion. Membrane surface manipulation can enhance selectivity, aiding in predicting NF treatment effectiveness for specific PFAS compounds.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.