Merve Sevinc Gunduz, Rustem Mustafaoglu, Ibrahim Halil Ural
{"title":"The Effects of Robot-Asssissted Gait Training on Balance and Fear of Falling in Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Merve Sevinc Gunduz, Rustem Mustafaoglu, Ibrahim Halil Ural","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was compare the effects of Combined Training (CombT), which included Robot-Assisted Gait Training in addition to Traditional Balance Training (TBT), and TBT alone on balance and fear of falling (FoF) in patients with stroke based on objective assessment methods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Patients were randomized into CombT Group (CombTG) (n = 21) and TBT Group (TBTG) (n = 21) for duration of 5-weeks. Balance were assessed with EncephaLog App recorded stand-up time (SUT), sit-down time (SDT), and directional sways during walking, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). International Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I) measured fear of falling (FoF). Fugl Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) assessed limb impairment. Foot posture were assessed with Foot Posture Index (FPI-6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the treatments, EncephaLog sways (anterior, medial, lateral: P = 0.04, P = 0.01, P = 0.02), SUT (P = 0.006), SDT (P = 0.002); BBS (P < 0.001); FES-I (P = 0.002) improved in CombTG. TUG (P = 0.01) and FMA-LE (P < 0.001) improved in TBTG. SUT (P = 0.01) and SDT (P = 0.04) showed statistically significant improvement in CombTG compared to TBTG; FMA-LE (P = 0.002) demonstrated statistically significant improvement in TBTG compared to CombTG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Objective assessment indicated that combined treatments in subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation enhance balance and reduce FoF more effectively than isolated approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was compare the effects of Combined Training (CombT), which included Robot-Assisted Gait Training in addition to Traditional Balance Training (TBT), and TBT alone on balance and fear of falling (FoF) in patients with stroke based on objective assessment methods.
Design: Patients were randomized into CombT Group (CombTG) (n = 21) and TBT Group (TBTG) (n = 21) for duration of 5-weeks. Balance were assessed with EncephaLog App recorded stand-up time (SUT), sit-down time (SDT), and directional sways during walking, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). International Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I) measured fear of falling (FoF). Fugl Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) assessed limb impairment. Foot posture were assessed with Foot Posture Index (FPI-6).
Results: After the treatments, EncephaLog sways (anterior, medial, lateral: P = 0.04, P = 0.01, P = 0.02), SUT (P = 0.006), SDT (P = 0.002); BBS (P < 0.001); FES-I (P = 0.002) improved in CombTG. TUG (P = 0.01) and FMA-LE (P < 0.001) improved in TBTG. SUT (P = 0.01) and SDT (P = 0.04) showed statistically significant improvement in CombTG compared to TBTG; FMA-LE (P = 0.002) demonstrated statistically significant improvement in TBTG compared to CombTG.
Conclusion: Objective assessment indicated that combined treatments in subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation enhance balance and reduce FoF more effectively than isolated approaches.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).