Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Morton's Neuroma: Outcomes and Predictors of Success.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Rafael Llombart-Blanco, Gonzalo Mariscal, María Benlloch, Carlos Barrios, Rafael Llombart-Ais
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Morton's Neuroma: Outcomes and Predictors of Success.","authors":"Rafael Llombart-Blanco, Gonzalo Mariscal, María Benlloch, Carlos Barrios, Rafael Llombart-Ais","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Morton's neuroma presents a challenge in terms of pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for Morton's neuroma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Prospective clinical trials, cohort studies, and case series were also included. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Meta-analysis applied fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effects of temperature, radiofrequency cycles, and imaging guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies ( N = 237) were included. Significant pain reduction was observed at the final follow-up (mean difference = 5.74; 95% confidence interval = 5.58, 5.90). At the final follow-up, 47.57% (95% confidence interval = 25.13%-70.00%) experienced complete pain relief, while 16.40% (95% confidence interval = 11.86%-20.94%) reported no benefit at final follow-up. Sensitivity analyses found higher-temperature settings (≥85°C) conferred greater relief on visual analog scale (mean difference = -6.97; 95% confidence interval = -6.75 to -7.18) compared to temperatures <85°C (mean difference = -3.94; 95% confidence interval = -3.68 to -4.19). Fewer radiofrequency cycles (≤3) also demonstrated significantly greater visual analog scale improvement (mean difference = -6.97; 95% confidence interval = -6.75 to -7.18) versus >three cycles (mean difference = -4.79; 95% confidence interval = -3.02 to -6.57). Complications were minimal (2.1%), and most resolved without significant interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation, particularly at specific temperatures and cycle thresholds, is effective and safe for the management of Morton's neuroma.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1): Determine the effect of knee extensor muscle strength changes on the medial and lateral meniscus, tibia, and medial and lateral femoral cartilage over 2 yrs in mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis patients; 2): Describe the correlation of knee extensor strength with the medial and lateral meniscus, tibia, and medial and lateral femoral cartilage at different WOMAC-pain levels; and 3): Discuss the relationship between changes in muscle strength and changes in meniscus and cartilage volume and WOMAC pain scores over 2 yrs in mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis patients.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"465-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Morton's neuroma presents a challenge in terms of pain management. This study aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for Morton's neuroma.

Design: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Prospective clinical trials, cohort studies, and case series were also included. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Meta-analysis applied fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effects of temperature, radiofrequency cycles, and imaging guidance.

Results: Eight studies ( N = 237) were included. Significant pain reduction was observed at the final follow-up (mean difference = 5.74; 95% confidence interval = 5.58, 5.90). At the final follow-up, 47.57% (95% confidence interval = 25.13%-70.00%) experienced complete pain relief, while 16.40% (95% confidence interval = 11.86%-20.94%) reported no benefit at final follow-up. Sensitivity analyses found higher-temperature settings (≥85°C) conferred greater relief on visual analog scale (mean difference = -6.97; 95% confidence interval = -6.75 to -7.18) compared to temperatures <85°C (mean difference = -3.94; 95% confidence interval = -3.68 to -4.19). Fewer radiofrequency cycles (≤3) also demonstrated significantly greater visual analog scale improvement (mean difference = -6.97; 95% confidence interval = -6.75 to -7.18) versus >three cycles (mean difference = -4.79; 95% confidence interval = -3.02 to -6.57). Complications were minimal (2.1%), and most resolved without significant interventions.

Conclusions: Radiofrequency ablation, particularly at specific temperatures and cycle thresholds, is effective and safe for the management of Morton's neuroma.

To claim cme credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.

Cme objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: 1): Determine the effect of knee extensor muscle strength changes on the medial and lateral meniscus, tibia, and medial and lateral femoral cartilage over 2 yrs in mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis patients; 2): Describe the correlation of knee extensor strength with the medial and lateral meniscus, tibia, and medial and lateral femoral cartilage at different WOMAC-pain levels; and 3): Discuss the relationship between changes in muscle strength and changes in meniscus and cartilage volume and WOMAC pain scores over 2 yrs in mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis patients.

Level: Advanced.

Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

射频消融治疗莫顿神经瘤的系统评价和荟萃分析:结果和成功的预测因素。
目的:莫顿神经瘤提出了疼痛管理方面的挑战。本研究旨在评估射频消融治疗莫顿神经瘤的有效性和安全性。设计:遵循PRISMA指南。前瞻性临床试验、队列研究和病例系列也包括在内。使用Review Manager 5.4进行数据分析。meta分析根据异质性采用固定或随机效应模型。进行敏感性分析以评估温度、射频周期和成像引导的影响。结果:纳入8项研究(n = 237)。在最后的随访中,疼痛明显减轻(MD5.74, 95%CI 5.58, 5.90)。在最后的随访中,47.57% (95%CI 25.13%-70.00%)的患者经历了完全的疼痛缓解,而16.40% (95%CI 11.86%-20.94%)的患者在最后的随访中没有获益。敏感性分析发现,与温度3个周期(MD-4.79, 95%CI -3.02至-6.57)相比,较高的温度设置(≥85°C)对VAS的缓解更大(MD-6.97, 95%CI -6.75至-7.18)。并发症最少(2.1%),大多数在没有显著干预的情况下得到解决。结论:射频消融,特别是在特定温度和周期阈值下,是治疗莫顿神经瘤的有效和安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信