Gerard E Francisco, Mikaela Raddatz, Kenji Yamazaki, Sunil Sabharwal, Keneshia Kirksey, Carolyn Kinney, Eric Holmboe
{"title":"Predicting Performance in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part II Certification Oral Examination Based On Milestone Ratings.","authors":"Gerard E Francisco, Mikaela Raddatz, Kenji Yamazaki, Sunil Sabharwal, Keneshia Kirksey, Carolyn Kinney, Eric Holmboe","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced the Milestones to document learner development within a competency-based framework. On the other hand, board certifying examinations serve as a summative evaluation of a learner's readiness for independent medical practice. Scores in Part I of the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) examination, which measures medical knowledge, has been shown to correlate only with Milestones ratings in medical knowledge. We hypothesized that combined ratings of various Milestone competencies can predict subsequent performance in related ABPMR Part II certifying examination domains. Milestones data and ABPMR Part II examination scores of trainees in 3-yr PM&R residency programs in the United States from academic years (AY) 2014-2016 who sat for the ABPMR Parts I and II Examinations, immediately after completion of training, were reviewed. Regression analysis showed that Milestone sub-competencies, alone or in combination, did not correlate with Part II domain scaled scores. Medical Knowledge was the only Milestone sub-competency that was correlated with performance in the ABPMR Part I certifying examination. This current study found that no similar association exists between any of the Milestones Competencies and the ABPMR Part II certifying examination, suggesting that the two assessment tools measure different attributes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced the Milestones to document learner development within a competency-based framework. On the other hand, board certifying examinations serve as a summative evaluation of a learner's readiness for independent medical practice. Scores in Part I of the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) examination, which measures medical knowledge, has been shown to correlate only with Milestones ratings in medical knowledge. We hypothesized that combined ratings of various Milestone competencies can predict subsequent performance in related ABPMR Part II certifying examination domains. Milestones data and ABPMR Part II examination scores of trainees in 3-yr PM&R residency programs in the United States from academic years (AY) 2014-2016 who sat for the ABPMR Parts I and II Examinations, immediately after completion of training, were reviewed. Regression analysis showed that Milestone sub-competencies, alone or in combination, did not correlate with Part II domain scaled scores. Medical Knowledge was the only Milestone sub-competency that was correlated with performance in the ABPMR Part I certifying examination. This current study found that no similar association exists between any of the Milestones Competencies and the ABPMR Part II certifying examination, suggesting that the two assessment tools measure different attributes.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).