Survival of the fittest? Peak oxygen uptake and all-cause mortality among older adults in Norway.

Atefe R Tari, Daniel E Brissach, Emma M L Ingeström, Javaid Nauman, Tristan Tyrell, Carl Foster, Kimberley Radtke, John P Porcari, Stian Lydersen, Leonard A Kaminsky, Jonathan Myers, Tara L Walker, Jeff S Coombes, Dorthe Stensvold, Ulrik Wisløff
{"title":"Survival of the fittest? Peak oxygen uptake and all-cause mortality among older adults in Norway.","authors":"Atefe R Tari, Daniel E Brissach, Emma M L Ingeström, Javaid Nauman, Tristan Tyrell, Carl Foster, Kimberley Radtke, John P Porcari, Stian Lydersen, Leonard A Kaminsky, Jonathan Myers, Tara L Walker, Jeff S Coombes, Dorthe Stensvold, Ulrik Wisløff","doi":"10.1016/j.pcad.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels needed to avoid the Grim Reaper (Death) among older adults. We hypothesized that an above average peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) is needed for 70-77-year-old men and women to delay the encounter with Death.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General population of older adults in Norway.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>788 women and 777 men aged 70-77 years.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Clinical assessments, including a test of VO<sub>2peak</sub>. Participants were categorised based on their baseline VO<sub>2peak</sub> and changes after 1 year. This study explored associations between VO<sub>2peak</sub> and 5-year all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>All-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Death caught up with 5.3 % of men and 3.7 % of women. Compared to unfit men and women, fewer men (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.15-0.78) and women (HR: 0.41, 95 % CI 0.17-0.98) classified as moderately fit encountered Death with no additional risk reduction among those classified as being more fit. It appears to be easier for the Grim Reaper to claim those in poorer physical condition, specifically VO<sub>2peak</sub> levels <26.5 mL/kg/min for men and 22.2 mL/kg/min for women (corresponding to ≥85 % of the observed age- and sex-specific average).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Grim Reaper typically targets individuals with VO<sub>2peak</sub> levels <26.5 mL/kg/min/ and <22.2 mL/kg/min when chasing male and female souls aged 70-77 years, respectively, reflecting his penchant for limited CRF. These data underscore the importance of maintaining or enhancing CRF throughout life, providing clear targets for clinicians in assessing patient CRF levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.govNCT01666340.</p>","PeriodicalId":94178,"journal":{"name":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2024.11.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels needed to avoid the Grim Reaper (Death) among older adults. We hypothesized that an above average peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is needed for 70-77-year-old men and women to delay the encounter with Death.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: General population of older adults in Norway.

Participants: 788 women and 777 men aged 70-77 years.

Intervention: Clinical assessments, including a test of VO2peak. Participants were categorised based on their baseline VO2peak and changes after 1 year. This study explored associations between VO2peak and 5-year all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.

Main outcome measure: All-cause mortality.

Results: Death caught up with 5.3 % of men and 3.7 % of women. Compared to unfit men and women, fewer men (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.15-0.78) and women (HR: 0.41, 95 % CI 0.17-0.98) classified as moderately fit encountered Death with no additional risk reduction among those classified as being more fit. It appears to be easier for the Grim Reaper to claim those in poorer physical condition, specifically VO2peak levels <26.5 mL/kg/min for men and 22.2 mL/kg/min for women (corresponding to ≥85 % of the observed age- and sex-specific average).

Conclusion: The Grim Reaper typically targets individuals with VO2peak levels <26.5 mL/kg/min/ and <22.2 mL/kg/min when chasing male and female souls aged 70-77 years, respectively, reflecting his penchant for limited CRF. These data underscore the importance of maintaining or enhancing CRF throughout life, providing clear targets for clinicians in assessing patient CRF levels.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT01666340.

适者生存?挪威老年人的峰值摄氧量和全因死亡率。
目的:确定老年人避免死神(死亡)所需的心肺健康(CRF)水平。我们假设70-77岁的男性和女性需要高于平均的峰值摄氧量(vo2峰值)来延迟与死亡的接触。设计:临床前瞻性队列研究。背景:挪威的普通老年人。参与者:年龄在70-77岁之间的788名女性和777名男性 岁。干预措施:临床评估,包括vo2峰值测试。参与者根据他们的基线vo2峰值和1 年后的变化进行分类。本研究使用Cox比例风险模型探讨了vo2峰值与5年全因死亡率之间的关系。主要结局指标:全因死亡率。结果:男性死亡率为5.3% %,女性死亡率为3.7% %。与不适合的男性和女性相比,被分类为中度适合的男性(危险比[HR]: 0.34, 95 %可信区间[CI] 0.15-0.78)和女性(危险比:0.41,95 % CI 0.17-0.98)较少死亡,而被分类为更适合的男性和女性没有额外的风险降低。似乎死神更容易宣称那些身体状况较差的人,特别是vo2峰值水平的人结论:死神通常针对vo2峰值水平的人试验注册:ClinicalTrials.govNCT01666340。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信